T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(24 Feb 2015 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(24 Feb 2015 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 20:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(24 Feb 2015 20:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 22:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 22:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 22:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(25 Feb 2015 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Edward Swatschek
(25 Feb 2015 09:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(25 Feb 2015 14:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(25 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(27 Feb 2015 14:29 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question
Anthony Jackson
(25 Feb 2015 01:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(25 Feb 2015 01:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Kelly St. Clair
(25 Feb 2015 06:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(25 Feb 2015 07:39 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(25 Feb 2015 04:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Dan Corrin
(24 Feb 2015 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Grimmund (24 Feb 2015 22:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Kurt Feltenberger
(25 Feb 2015 02:54 UTC)
|
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz <schwartz.jeffrey@gmail.com> wrote: > For example: > Power Plant-A is a TL9 thing. > If I build it as "Modified", then it is 2 TL's higher, a little > smaller, and half price. > So a TL-11 power plant would be half the price of a TL9 one, a little > smaller, a little more reliable. Makes sense. > You can build a TL9 plant as "Ultimate" , +4 TLs, and it's got much > more output, much smaller, more fuel efficient... and 4x normal price. > That kinda makes sense too : "We're taking every thing we know about > building these, and building the best we can, with cost as no object." > Such a power plant would be TL13..... > > Which leads to my question: > Can one build a TL13 "Ultimate", then apply the +2TL "Modified" on it > to bump up to TL15? > Which would make it even smaller, more efficient, but best of all > change the price from x4 to x4/2 ? How does this compare to, say, High Guard? Or are you talking about an actual "Power Plant A" as opposed to a TL9 power plant of rated output X? High Guard drives got smaller for the same rated performance as TL went up. Yay for efficiency. But if you built a drive of performance X, that's what it was- all your benefits were from the TL increase. I would generally expect the same for T5. Dan -- "Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook." -Alan Morgan