T5 Rules question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Feb 2015 16:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question tmr0195@xxxxxx (24 Feb 2015 17:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Richard Aiken (24 Feb 2015 20:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Feb 2015 20:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Richard Aiken (24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese (24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (24 Feb 2015 21:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese (24 Feb 2015 21:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (24 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese (24 Feb 2015 21:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Richard Aiken (24 Feb 2015 22:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (24 Feb 2015 22:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (24 Feb 2015 22:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Richard Aiken (24 Feb 2015 22:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (25 Feb 2015 00:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Edward Swatschek (25 Feb 2015 09:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Jeffrey Schwartz (25 Feb 2015 14:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question tmr0195@xxxxxx (25 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Jeffrey Schwartz (27 Feb 2015 14:29 UTC)
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question Anthony Jackson (25 Feb 2015 01:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Richard Aiken (25 Feb 2015 01:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Kelly St. Clair (25 Feb 2015 06:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese (25 Feb 2015 07:39 UTC)
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese (25 Feb 2015 04:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Dan Corrin (24 Feb 2015 21:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Bruce Johnson (24 Feb 2015 21:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Grimmund (24 Feb 2015 22:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Kurt Feltenberger (25 Feb 2015 02:54 UTC)

Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Phil Pugliese 24 Feb 2015 21:51 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 2/24/15, Bruce Johnson <johnson@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:

 Again and again we’re
 clubbed over the head with the fact the the writers of
 Traveller have only a fleeting and illusory grasp of
 economics.

 For lower TL
 items to maintain market share in the face of cheaper,
 better items made at a higher TL to those lower TL points
 there would either have to be substantial savings in buying
 them (which there isn’t) or some substantial barrier to
 getting the ‘low tl things made at high tl’s.

 This is *kind* of a indicator
 of a ‘low trade’ model for the OTU, but that explodes in
 a poof of magic smoke when it hits reality: a ‘low
 trade’ OTU cannot possibly support a mercantilist, heavily
 militarized, trillions of starships OTU. If you have very
 little trade, there’s no point to the IN, let alone the
 kinds of infrastructure that produces 200dT Far Traders.
 Starships would be exptremely rare and astonishingly
 expensive.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Actually, we've been over this point many, many times before & the answer always is;

"Yes, it can!"

The OTU can & does (it's 'canon', No?) support just such a 'low-trade' universe.

It just depends on what eco-rules one chooses to apply.

It is, after all, fantasy...

=============================================================