Could someone check my maths, please? David Shaw (14 Jan 2015 18:47 UTC)
RE: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Anthony Jackson (14 Jan 2015 18:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? shadow@xxxxxx (15 Jan 2015 06:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Kelly St. Clair (14 Jan 2015 18:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Craig Berry (14 Jan 2015 19:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? David Shaw (15 Jan 2015 23:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 04:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Kelly St. Clair (16 Jan 2015 04:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 05:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Greg Nokes (16 Jan 2015 23:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (17 Jan 2015 08:49 UTC)

Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? David Shaw 15 Jan 2015 23:35 UTC


On 14/01/15 18:47, David Shaw wrote:
> I have never attempted relativistic calculations before and wondered if
> I have this right.
>
> I am currently reading John Ringo's 'Gust Front' in which a ground based
> anti-starship weapon is described as firing bars of depleted uranium,
> 100mm in diameter and two metres long at a muzzle velocity of 0.3c.
>
> I make this a KE of 1.302 exa-Joules, equivalent to a touch over 311MT
> of TNT.  Is this right?  And would such a weapon system really be
> feasible within an Earth-standard atmosphere?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David Shaw

Many thanks to all for the replies. So, the moral is, the 'science' is
more dramatic than factual.  At least he hasn't yet had his characters
try and solve the problem by reversing the polarity of the POTW(*) flux  :-)

David Shaw

(*)POTW - Particle Of The Week(TM)