In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeff Zeitlin (16 Jan 2023 16:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Evyn MacDude (16 Jan 2023 23:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeffrey Schwartz (17 Jan 2023 22:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Timothy Collinson (17 Jan 2023 22:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Kurt Feltenberger (18 Jan 2023 00:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeffrey Schwartz (18 Jan 2023 02:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Phil Pugliese (18 Jan 2023 07:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Rupert Boleyn (18 Jan 2023 07:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Phil Pugliese (18 Jan 2023 17:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Richard Aiken (19 Jan 2023 04:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Phil Pugliese (19 Jan 2023 08:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... James Catchpole (16 Jan 2023 23:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Rupert Boleyn (16 Jan 2023 23:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeff Zeitlin (17 Jan 2023 00:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeff Zeitlin (17 Jan 2023 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... David Johnson (17 Jan 2023 02:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Timothy Collinson (17 Jan 2023 22:08 UTC)
RE: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... ewan@xxxxxx (22 Jan 2023 21:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... James Catchpole (22 Jan 2023 21:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Thomas Jones-Low (22 Jan 2023 22:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... James Catchpole (23 Jan 2023 00:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Rupert Boleyn (23 Jan 2023 04:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Ewan (23 Jan 2023 13:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Ethan McKinney (16 Jan 2023 23:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeff Zeitlin (17 Jan 2023 00:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Timothy Collinson (17 Jan 2023 22:04 UTC)

Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Rupert Boleyn 23 Jan 2023 04:14 UTC


On 23Jan2023 1147, Thomas Jones-Low - tjoneslow at gmail.com (via tml
list) wrote:
>
> the WOTC licensing changes is creating a new open game license. Mongoose
> has signed on to using this new game license with their second edition
> rules.
>
> If this plays out the way it looks like, Cepheus may be able to continue to
> publish with the second edition Mongoose rules.
The current new OGL from WotC is not great in a number of ways for third
party publishers.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>