In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Jeff Zeitlin
(16 Jan 2023 16:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Evyn MacDude
(16 Jan 2023 23:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Jan 2023 22:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Timothy Collinson
(17 Jan 2023 22:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Jan 2023 00:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Jeffrey Schwartz
(18 Jan 2023 02:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jan 2023 07:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Jan 2023 07:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jan 2023 17:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Richard Aiken
(19 Jan 2023 04:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Phil Pugliese
(19 Jan 2023 08:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
James Catchpole
(16 Jan 2023 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Rupert Boleyn
(16 Jan 2023 23:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw... Jeff Zeitlin (17 Jan 2023 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Jeff Zeitlin
(17 Jan 2023 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
David Johnson
(17 Jan 2023 02:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Timothy Collinson
(17 Jan 2023 22:08 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
ewan@xxxxxx
(22 Jan 2023 21:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
James Catchpole
(22 Jan 2023 21:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Thomas Jones-Low
(22 Jan 2023 22:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
James Catchpole
(23 Jan 2023 00:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Rupert Boleyn
(23 Jan 2023 04:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Ewan
(23 Jan 2023 13:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Ethan McKinney
(16 Jan 2023 23:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Jeff Zeitlin
(17 Jan 2023 00:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] In Re The OGL Foofaraw...
Timothy Collinson
(17 Jan 2023 22:04 UTC)
|
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:26:52 +1300, Rupert Boleyn wrote: >The OGL's primary value was in the certainty it provided - much of what >is/was 'granted' is/was already legal, but given TSR's (and others') >habit of going after people for infringements that weren't and killing >them with the cost of fighting (e.g. GDW & Gygax over Dangerous >Journeys/Mythus), that certainty was a huge deal. Yes. This was the point "b" in the reasons a publisher needs an OGL or equivalent (from my original post). >WotC has managed to flush over twenty years of trust and goodwill down >the toilet in a couple of weeks. I'm not entirely convinced that they _had_ that trust and goodwill; their early behavior - pre-OGL - was enough to get them the stink-eye pretty much no matter what they did. It might have reduced the situation to "keep your powder dry and make sure you've got your bullet mold" rather than "keep your weapon locked and loaded", which is arguably an improvement - but is that really "trust" and "goodwill"? ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2022. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)