Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
|
Fusion by 2025?
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ewan Quibell
(20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
|
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 23:23 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Edward Swatschek
(22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kenneth Barns
(22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)
|
*Everything* depends on the State for it's existence nowadays & that includes all the left-wing politically-correct schemes that are so prevalent. The difference is that the socialists believe that economic common sense should take a back seat to ideological considerations, which eventually results in a wrecked economy. -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 11/5/14, Ian Whitchurch <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com Date: Wednesday, November 5, 2014, 3:35 PM One of the many things that makes me shake my head is how avowed anti-socialists reliably support fission power plants, that are completely reliant on the State for their existence. They rely on State power for their insurance, with laws exempting them from being sued in the case of malfunction. They rely on State subsidies for their construction. They rely on the State to pay for their decommissioning. They rely on the State to dictate the prices their customers must pay. I mean, really, every cooling tower on a fission plant should have a hammer and sickle painted on the side. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows: -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 10/22/14, Colin Paddock <xxxxxx@clearwire.net> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014, 6:21 PM On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote: The reason nuclear power isn’t a big thing right now has far, far less to do with the dirty smelly anti-nuke hippies than the guys in the bank offices with the green visors. Fission plants are a hella lot more expensive to build, run, maintain and (eventually) decommission than they were sold as. Believe me, if nuclear power plants were profitable, all the DSANH’s in the world would have not been enough to stop the profit machines. As supporting evidence, note that a whole lot of DSANH-type people aren't at all fond of petroleum. All their protests haven't done diddly to that market... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It was Merkel's personal bias against nuke power that has shut down the plants in germany. I used to watch DW-TV & the commentators mentioned it more than once. Besides, it's well established that DSANH's have little to no effect on anything. It's the mainstream Left that loves to dictate to us peons/serfs/whatever who they believe need their 'guidance' so much. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capitalism really sucks until the experience the alternatives imposed by the 'ivory-tower' 'eggheads', serene in their detachment from reality, secure in their 'cloud-cities', & oh, so superior to the 'great unwashed' beneath them. ----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://archives.simplelists.com ----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a