Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives

Show/hide message thread

Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kenneth Barns (27 Oct 2014 13:21 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (27 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (27 Oct 2014 17:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kenneth Barns (27 Oct 2014 19:52 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2014 02:54 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kenneth Barns (28 Oct 2014 07:58 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2014 22:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kenneth Barns (29 Oct 2014 00:30 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2014 05:23 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (04 Nov 2014 16:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (04 Nov 2014 23:18 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 00:39 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (05 Nov 2014 02:28 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 03:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (05 Nov 2014 19:09 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Ian Whitchurch (05 Nov 2014 21:51 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 22:01 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Ian Whitchurch (05 Nov 2014 22:22 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:43 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 Nov 2014 22:29 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Bruce Johnson (05 Nov 2014 23:09 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:36 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:26 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kelly St. Clair (06 Nov 2014 01:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (06 Nov 2014 09:00 UTC)

[TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Alex Goodwin (06 Nov 2014 12:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Ian Whitchurch (06 Nov 2014 13:27 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Alex Goodwin (06 Nov 2014 14:29 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Ian Whitchurch (06 Nov 2014 21:05 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Bruce Johnson (06 Nov 2014 21:28 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Ian Whitchurch (06 Nov 2014 22:53 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Evyn MacDude (06 Nov 2014 23:40 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Freelance Traveller (07 Nov 2014 01:31 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Alex Goodwin (07 Nov 2014 01:50 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Ian Whitchurch (07 Nov 2014 02:56 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Alex Goodwin (07 Nov 2014 07:10 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Ian Whitchurch (07 Nov 2014 07:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Bruce Johnson (07 Nov 2014 16:21 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Evyn MacDude (08 Nov 2014 01:14 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Richard Aiken (08 Nov 2014 01:42 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Freelance Traveller (06 Nov 2014 13:33 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple economically-interesting worlds in system Alex Goodwin (06 Nov 2014 13:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 13:31 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (09 Nov 2014 08:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (09 Nov 2014 18:16 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Ian Whitchurch (10 Nov 2014 02:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (10 Nov 2014 02:47 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Kelly St. Clair (10 Nov 2014 03:01 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (10 Nov 2014 06:44 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Bruce Johnson (10 Nov 2014 18:51 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (10 Nov 2014 22:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Richard Aiken (10 Nov 2014 06:45 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Thomas Jones-Low (10 Nov 2014 13:27 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (10 Nov 2014 22:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Bruce Johnson (10 Nov 2014 23:10 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Phil Pugliese (05 Nov 2014 19:11 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 20:16 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 Nov 2014 06:26 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 12:31 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 Nov 2014 17:01 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 Nov 2014 20:22 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund (05 Nov 2014 20:29 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Eris Reddoch (05 Nov 2014 21:50 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 Nov 2014 22:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives Grimmund 04 Nov 2014 16:24 UTC

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:23 AM,  <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote:

> Of course on the COTI forums several members don't recognize
> the architect's fee as part the first hull's cost.

Technically, achitecht's fees are not part of the first hull's cost.

You pay the architect's fee to get the plans to build the ship.

Whether you actually build one or not is an entirely separate
question. Even if you decide not to build one, you still owe the
architect their fees for the design work.

 Dan

--

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine
kook." -Alan Morgan