Re: [TML] 'Rocket Science' gets even 'harder'!
Phil Pugliese 03 Nov 2014 20:19 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 11/3/14, Bruce Johnson <johnson@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] 'Rocket Science' gets even 'harder'!
To: "tml@simplelists.com" <tml@simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, November 3, 2014, 11:16 AM
On Nov
3, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com>
wrote:
> The NTSB's
preliminary
> investigation is pointing
at the feathering
> system being
activated early and that it was
> pilot
error.
>
> http://www.voanews.com/content/ntsb-descent-system-of-crashed-virgin-spacecraft-activated-early/2505720.html
>
> --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Anyone have any info
as to how that would cause an explosion?
It appears that the aircraft didn't
explode, actually since the propellant tanks and rocket
motors were found to be intact. The airframe broke apart,
either as a result of the feathering system being activated
or as a precipitating even for the activation.
Ars Technica has an article
with some photos of the event <http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/11/ntsb-spaceshiptwo-broke-apart-when-feathering-activated-early/>
=========================================================================================
After looking at the photos it *does* appear that there is a 'flash' of some sort seen in the 3rd photo.
Could that have been from the ejection system?
Or was it something else?
===========================================================================================