Ping... Phil Pugliese (17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Andrew Long (17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Richard Aiken (18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Kelly St. Clair (18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Andrew Long (18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
Fusion by 2025? Kurt Feltenberger (18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kelly St. Clair (18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Craig Berry (19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Craig Berry (19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Richard Aiken (20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ewan Quibell (20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Tim (21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? David Shaw (21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Edward Swatschek (22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kenneth Barns (22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Colin Paddock (23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? David Shaw (23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Colin Paddock (05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kelly St. Clair (06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Tim (06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Phil Pugliese (18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Richard Aiken (20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Phil Pugliese (20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Kurt Feltenberger (20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson 21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC

On Oct 21, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Anthony Jackson <xxxxxx@iii.com> wrote:

>
> This is comparable to *2 months* of casualties from coal power, and is the worst accident in decades. It really is bad risk assessment.

Agreed, aside from “oh yeah we cannot inhabit this large chunk of Japan for a thousand years or so”

Immediate casualties aren’t the only costs from a nuclear accident. <http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/chernobyl-ghost-cities>

Of course, continuing to use coal is going to kill a hella lot more people, but we have huge chunks of the population in absolute denial of that.

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs