Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
|
Fusion by 2025?
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ewan Quibell
(20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? David Shaw (21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
|
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 23:23 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Edward Swatschek
(22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kenneth Barns
(22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)
|
On 21/10/14 18:58, Bruce Johnson wrote: > Germany dumped their nukes in response to Fukushima, which was not an > altogether idiotic thing to do. If a country as allegedly > technocratic and competent as Japan could have such a disaster, the > people of Germany certainly thought that they no longer wished to > have that risk. > > YOU may think it’s irrational, but that doesn’t make it so. Yeah, but just how many nuclear reactors in Germany were likely to be hit by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake swiftly followed by several million tonnes of seawater crashing over them in the resultant tsunami? I wonder just who, no matter how technocratic and competent, could design a nuclear plant to withstand that. David Shaw