Back to our 'big ship' discussion Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 00:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Greg Caires (21 Oct 2014 02:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Craig Berry (21 Oct 2014 02:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 03:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 08:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund (21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 15:15 UTC)

Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund 21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
<xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
>  Remember
>  they will be on J3+ routes only, as there are only a few
>  ports in the world that can support Triple
>  E's (18 all told half in
>  asia the other
>  half in Europe)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So they can't come to North America at all!

Oh, they could visit.  They'd have trouble loading and unloading
directly; have to re-handle a lot of containers.

Hmmm.  Adventure seed....

Dan

--

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine
kook." -Alan Morgan