Back to our 'big ship' discussion Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 00:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Greg Caires (21 Oct 2014 02:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Craig Berry (21 Oct 2014 02:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 03:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 08:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund (21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 15:15 UTC)

Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Evyn MacDude 21 Oct 2014 03:18 UTC

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Bruce Johnson
<xxxxxx@pharmacy.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Some real-world news, Maesk has commissioned 20 'biggest ships in the world' capable of carrying 18,000 standard 20-foot containers each <http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/20/010252/the-largest-ship-in-the-world-is-being-built-in-korea>
>
> That's 42KdT of cargo alone ...

Remember they will be on J3+ routes only, as there are only a few
ports in the world that can support Triple E's (18 all told half in
asia the other half in Europe)
--
Evyn