Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
|
Fusion by 2025?
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ewan Quibell
(20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
|
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 23:23 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Edward Swatschek
(22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kenneth Barns
(22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)
|
From: Phil Pugliese (via tml list) > > They're defense contractors. They wouldn’t come out publicly with > this without being really really sure they could get a crapton of > money for trying. Eh, not necessarily. They may well think they've solved something. It's even possible that they're right. It's also possible that they're about to burn a significant amount of money on a wild goose chase, or that they've been taken in by some crackpot. As long as they aren't specifically asking for investors, it's at least not a clear and direct scam, except possibly against LM. That said, Lockheed Martin being involved just changes my estimates of their odds from "astronomically low" to "very low".