Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Andrew Long
(18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
|
Fusion by 2025?
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Craig Berry
(19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ewan Quibell
(20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
|
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(21 Oct 2014 23:23 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Anthony Jackson
(21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Edward Swatschek
(22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kenneth Barns
(22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Greg Chalik
(22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
David Shaw
(23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Bruce Johnson
(23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Colin Paddock
(05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Kelly St. Clair
(06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Phil Pugliese
(06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
Tim
(06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Richard Aiken
(20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Phil Pugliese
(20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping...
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)
|
-------------------------------------------- On Sun, 10/19/14, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> Date: Sunday, October 19, 2014, 7:25 PM On Oct 19, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: Lockheed Martin also reassures me. Considering the number of sensitive military contracts they handle (assuming they're still in the same business as when I was in the Air Force), I doubt they would come out publicly with anything like this unless they were really, really, really sure they could do it. ========================================================== AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! They're defense contractors. They wouldn’t come out publicly with this without being really really sure they could get a crapton of money for trying. There’s no reason to believe that LockMart, even the Skunkworks, has the secret sauce that thousands and thousands of people have spent billions of dollars trying to perfect without success. I’ll be perfectly, ecstatically happy to eat a whole platter-full of crow on this, but I rather doubt they’ve cracked it. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyone who deals w/ *any* kind of contractors soon finds out they're all the same; Masters of the snow job! They'll promise anything to get a sale/contract. Left-wing, right-wing, politically-correct, politically-incorrect, they're all essentially the same as used-car salesman. (For a while, I personally knew a guy who became a car salesman. The 'special' sales training they were given was a real eye-opener)