Yes, I certainly would hope so but things just don't always work out that way...

--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 10/18/14, Craig Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Date: Saturday, October 18, 2014, 8:28 PM

 If we had
 a means of generating effectively unlimited power at minimal
 cost, I think we could get past the
 misunderstandings.
 On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at
 5:32 PM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 This
 email was sent from yahoo.com which
 does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists.
 Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com)
 has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
 follows:

 --------------------------------------------

 On Sat, 10/18/14, Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org>
 wrote:

  Subject: Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025?

  To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com

  Date: Saturday, October 18, 2014, 10:16 AM

  Fusion, like

  "true" AI, has been ten years away since I was
 a

  kid.

  --

  ---------------

 And, on top of that, to most folks "fusion power
 plant" is the same thing as "nuclear power
 plants".

 And 'nuke' plants, with a few exceptions like France
 etc, are just too 'politically incorrect' (what
 would Al Gore say?) to really take hold.

 Sad, but true...

  =================================================================================

 -----

 The Traveller Mailing List

 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml

 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com

 To unsubscribe from this list please goto

 http://archives.simplelists.com

 --

 Craig Berry (http://google.com/+CraigBerry)
 "Eternity is in love with the productions
 of time." - William Blake

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a