EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Jeffrey Schwartz
(01 Aug 2014 16:39 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Anthony Jackson
(01 Aug 2014 18:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Bruce Johnson
(01 Aug 2014 18:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Jeffrey Schwartz
(01 Aug 2014 19:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Bruce Johnson
(01 Aug 2014 20:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
shadow@xxxxxx
(03 Aug 2014 18:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Tim
(04 Aug 2014 05:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Richard Aiken
(04 Aug 2014 10:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Tim
(04 Aug 2014 14:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful
Ian Whitchurch
(04 Aug 2014 22:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] EmDrive test ... somewhat successful Bruce Johnson (04 Aug 2014 22:47 UTC)
|
On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Ian Whitchurch <ian.whitchurch@gmail.com> wrote: > Im just going to leave this here > > http://journals.jps.jp/doi/pdf/10.7566/JPSCP.1.015059 This is an ion drive, not the allegedly ‘massless' EM drive under discussion. There is a reaction mass here, it’s the plasma created by the cathode arc. This is why more efficient ion drives use really heavy ions. Ion drives are a well tested technology and have been utilized on a ‘production’ space probe: <http://nmp.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/ionpropfaq.html> -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs