New Scientist 12 March 2022 Timothy Collinson (04 Apr 2022 13:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Bruce Johnson (04 Apr 2022 20:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Timothy Collinson (05 Apr 2022 05:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Thomas Jones-Low (05 Apr 2022 10:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Roger Gammans (05 Apr 2022 11:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Bruce Johnson (07 Apr 2022 21:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Mark Urbin (07 Apr 2022 22:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Bruce Johnson (07 Apr 2022 21:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Timothy Collinson (09 Apr 2022 05:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Bruce Johnson (11 Apr 2022 17:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Timothy Collinson (11 Apr 2022 21:02 UTC)

Re: [TML] New Scientist 12 March 2022 Thomas Jones-Low 05 Apr 2022 10:41 UTC

On 4/4/2022 4:59 PM, Bruce Johnson - johnson at Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU (via tml
list) wrote:
> I have often wondered why solar panels aren’t backed with some sort of water
> cooling systems; the hot water produced could simply be used as such or the sort
> of heat transfer mechanism they use for solar water heating in places where it
> would freeze (iirc they use ethylene glycol as the working fluid, and dump the
> heat into the water tank) as solar cell efficiency going down as a function of
> heat is a well known issue in hot climates, to the point where it affects the
> square footage of panel needed to produce a particular nominal  power generation.
>
>

	I know there are repeated plans to put solar panels over the water canals used
in California and Arizona. This would a) generate power, b) reduce the
evaporation from said canals, and c) allow the panels to generate more power
because the back of the panels are cooler.

	The reason for not having done this is mostly political inertia.