More for culture design: Inheritance Freelance Traveller (24 Jul 2014 17:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] More for culture design: Inheritance
Timothy Collinson
(24 Jul 2014 21:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] More for culture design: Inheritance
Rupert Boleyn
(24 Jul 2014 21:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] More for culture design: Inheritance
Phil Pugliese
(31 Jul 2014 20:30 UTC)
|
While it doesn't necessarily have to be, naming patterns can be influenced by inheritance patterns and patterns of exercise of power (where the latter two can but need not be linked). Here's a summary of some inheritance/power patterns that have been described as existing in the real world or in published fiction: 1. Cognatic Primogeniture: Descent in the senior male line only. If the line becomes extinct, go back to the most recent generation where the heir had a brother, and follow the brother's line - through males only - to the present day. This was a relatively common pattern among European royalty. (An obvious variation on this could be FEMALE 'cognatic' primogeniture - which appears to be the canonical [or at least semi-canonical] mode for inheritance in the Matriarchy of Mora (and thus for the Duchy of Mora).) 2. Agnatic Primogeniture: Descent may be through female lines, but preference is given to male over female, even if the female is the elder. In Absolute Agnatic Primogeniture, no preference for males is recognized; the eldest is the heir, regardless of sex. Although not yet codified in law in the Commonwealth, the Perth Agreement specifies that all Commonwealth countries are to pass local legislation affirming absolute agnatic primogeniture for the respective crowns, and all such legislation will take effect simultaneously. 3. Discussion here and in other Traveller forums, and possibly attested in canonical material, suggests that traditional Vilani (which may or may not include Luriani /Mmarislusant/ - care to comment, Andrea?) use absolute agnatic tercerogeniture - that is, the third child inherits (per the referenced discussion, presumably the first becomes a shugilii, the second goes into the military). 4. One possibilty that leaves inheritance an open question as long as possible is ultimogeniture - the _last_ child (subject to e.g., cognatic restrictions) is the one that inherits. 5. Matrilineal descent can complicate matters, especially if power vests in the male. In matrilineal cognatic primogeniture, your son isn't your heir; rather, it's your eldest sister's eldest son that's your heir - and your son may be the heir of your wife's eldest brother. If it's not _primogeniture_, it can get even more complex. Or reflect that - patrilineal descent, but power vests in the female. 6. The way the Warrant of Restoration is written, there's no method specified of determining the heir (trust me on this; I wrote the thing), and the Moot pretty much is expected to confirm except in cases of obvious incompetence. That implicitly leaves it up to the dynast to decide, and the "current" Alkhalikoi dynasty appears to use absolute agnatic primogeniture. There's nothing to say, though, that the heir can't be determined simply by the Emperor nominating some individual he deems appropriately deserving, or adopting such a person. The adoption route wasn't unknown among the Romans, either; IIRC, Octavian was _not_ related by blood to Julius. 8. In the world of Randall Garrett's _Lord Darcy_, the Plantagenets still rule the Angevin Empire, and reign over the Germanies and the Italian States. Imperium for the latter was declared at some time in the past to vest in the current Angevin king-emperor of the House of Plantagenet, and while cognatic primogeniture was expected, technically, the Angevin parliament could _choose_ one of the other Plantagenet princes to become King-Emperor instead. 9. While it was in reality no doubt a bit messier than my description makes it sound, the old Soviet system essentially named a premier for life, and on his death - which might not have been natural - the Supreme Soviet elected his replacement. Arguably, modern republics - and most constitutional monarchies - use a more benign form of this. (Yes, election is a legitimate method of determining inheritance. For non-power inheritance, there's no reason that a family couldn't do something similar, and a will naming heir(s) is, essentially, a statement of election of heir(s) by an electorate of one.) -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Fanzine and Resource editor@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com http://freelancetraveller.downport.com/ ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2014. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: CyberNET Web Hosting (http://www.cyberwebhosting.net) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)