What is covered by a UK arms embargo Postmark (20 Feb 2022 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Zeitlin (21 Feb 2022 00:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Rowse (21 Feb 2022 12:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Timothy Collinson (21 Feb 2022 19:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo James Davies (21 Feb 2022 19:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Alex Goodwin (22 Feb 2022 14:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Zeitlin (24 Feb 2022 00:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Rowse (24 Feb 2022 12:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Alex Goodwin (24 Feb 2022 14:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Rowse (03 Mar 2022 12:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Alex Goodwin (03 Mar 2022 16:23 UTC)

Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Zeitlin 24 Feb 2022 00:59 UTC

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:06:00 +1000, Alex Goodwin
<xxxxxx@multitel.com.au> wrote:

>Dual-use technologies, anyone?
>
>
>Gets even more interesting if not all of those governments agree on what
>is on the "nice" list.
>
>Or if, Government A encourages, by policy or by official neglect,
>shipping stuff to B's turf that is definitely on B's "not-nice" list.

Another fun situation arises where for domestic political reasons you
can't sell [directly] to Starbellisneechia, but for astropolitical
reasons it's better if Starbellisneechia has _your_ technology rather
than Whovillia's - so you sell to Grinchistan and "forget" to include
the no-transfer clauses in the contracts, knowing full well that
Grinchistan and Starbellisneechia have a close technology-sharing
agreement...