3I risk-free rate?
Alex Goodwin
(05 Jan 2022 10:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Jan 2022 11:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Alex Goodwin
(05 Jan 2022 12:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Ian Whitchurch
(05 Jan 2022 22:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Rupert Boleyn
(05 Jan 2022 13:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Kurt Feltenberger (07 Jan 2022 00:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Jan 2022 04:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Alex Goodwin
(07 Jan 2022 04:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Jan 2022 05:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Phil Pugliese
(07 Jan 2022 05:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Jan 2022 11:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Phil Pugliese
(07 Jan 2022 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Richard Aiken
(07 Jan 2022 14:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate?
Phil Pugliese
(07 Jan 2022 15:35 UTC)
|
On 1/5/2022 5:19 AM, Alex Goodwin - alex.goodwin at multitel.com.au (via tml list) wrote: > Although in the farthest bounds of theory, a central government does > have the option of not meeting its debts, the 3I is built on the > rubble of, and lessons learned from, the 2I, in which goverment > defaults (such as intra-Treasury punchups) helped propel the wheels > clear of the chassis. > > A _functioning_ 3I will thus go to extreme lengths, I posit, to avoid > even considering default. I would think that, except for exceptional times - major war, that the Imperium would have a "no deficit" rule. With something as large and as wide spanning as the 3I, deficit spending would be an accounting nightmare which would them become a social and political nightmare as well. -- Kurt Feltenberger xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com “Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com