3I risk-free rate? Alex Goodwin (05 Jan 2022 10:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Ian Whitchurch (05 Jan 2022 11:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Alex Goodwin (05 Jan 2022 12:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Ian Whitchurch (05 Jan 2022 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Rupert Boleyn (05 Jan 2022 13:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Kurt Feltenberger (07 Jan 2022 00:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Rupert Boleyn (07 Jan 2022 04:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Alex Goodwin (07 Jan 2022 04:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Rupert Boleyn (07 Jan 2022 05:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2022 05:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Rupert Boleyn (07 Jan 2022 11:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2022 16:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Richard Aiken (07 Jan 2022 14:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2022 15:35 UTC)

Re: [TML] 3I risk-free rate? Kurt Feltenberger 07 Jan 2022 00:51 UTC

On 1/5/2022 5:19 AM, Alex Goodwin - alex.goodwin at multitel.com.au (via
tml list) wrote:
> Although in the farthest bounds of theory, a central government does
> have the option of not meeting its debts, the 3I is built on the
> rubble of, and lessons learned from, the 2I, in which goverment
> defaults (such as intra-Treasury punchups) helped propel the wheels
> clear of the chassis.
>
> A _functioning_ 3I will thus go to extreme lengths, I posit, to avoid
> even considering default.

I would think that, except for exceptional times - major war, that the
Imperium would have a "no deficit" rule.  With something as large and as
wide spanning as the 3I, deficit spending would be an accounting
nightmare which would them become a social and political nightmare as well.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com