|
Question for the audience
Charles McKnight
(07 Nov 2021 18:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Timothy Collinson
(07 Nov 2021 21:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
James Catchpole
(07 Nov 2021 22:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Charles McKnight
(07 Nov 2021 22:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Charles McKnight
(07 Nov 2021 22:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Jeff Zeitlin
(07 Nov 2021 23:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Rupert Boleyn (08 Nov 2021 00:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Charles McKnight
(08 Nov 2021 00:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Alex Goodwin
(08 Nov 2021 05:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(08 Nov 2021 05:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(08 Nov 2021 04:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Rupert Boleyn
(08 Nov 2021 04:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(08 Nov 2021 05:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Rupert Boleyn
(08 Nov 2021 08:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Chuck McKnight
(08 Nov 2021 14:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(08 Nov 2021 18:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Graham Donald
(08 Nov 2021 23:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(09 Nov 2021 00:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Zane Healy
(09 Nov 2021 02:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Graham Donald
(09 Nov 2021 05:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Zane Healy
(09 Nov 2021 23:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Phil Pugliese
(09 Nov 2021 19:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Zane Healy
(10 Nov 2021 02:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Ingo Siekmann
(10 Nov 2021 18:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Question for the audience
Evyn MacDude
(08 Nov 2021 17:31 UTC)
|
On 08Nov2021 1254, Jeff Zeitlin - editor at freelancetraveller.com (via tml list) wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:57:06 +0000, Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson at > port.ac.uk (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance > Traveller: > >> Imagine the Dewey Decimal System with only the 100s level categories. > Just a random side comment - and this is NOT my American parochialism > coming out - but the Dewey system quite frankly stinks (I wanted to use a > stronger word); the Library of Congress system makes far more sense. Well, seeing as the Dewey system was invented by an American, preferring one American system over another is hardly parochial. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
