[Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Jeff Zeitlin
(11 Sep 2021 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Alex Goodwin
(17 Sep 2021 19:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Jeff Zeitlin
(17 Sep 2021 23:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Alex Goodwin
(18 Sep 2021 17:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Evyn MacDude
(18 Sep 2021 22:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Timothy Collinson
(20 Sep 2021 03:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion Jeff Zeitlin (16 Oct 2021 13:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [Freelance Traveller] FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION - "Model" of religion
Alex Goodwin
(16 Oct 2021 14:38 UTC)
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 03:16:53 +1000, Alex Goodwin <xxxxxx@multitel.com.au> wrote: >On 18/9/21 9:43 am, Jeff Zeitlin - editor at freelancetraveller.com (via >tml list) wrote: >>> How would a single-metameme-dominant religion, as a class, vary from one >>> where two of them are roughly equal in import? >> Mostly in the style of ritual, and possibly the role of clergy. Both of >> those are to be covered in other sections of the document. >> Right now, I just want to make sure that I have an exhaustive (or very >> nearly so) partition of Models (or metamemes, as you've put it). > On further thought, and nicking liberally from Winchell Chung of Atomic >Rockets (who dug upand applied Mendeleev's observation that building a >framework allows you to look for interesting holes), that gives you 7 >categories (with somewhat blurry lines between them) of religion - 3 >independent binary variables (given metameme dominant or not), trivially >excluding the empty-dominant set. > >For a first attempt: > >{Propitiatory / Ethical / Transcendental}-dominant - named metameme >dominates the two others; > >{Propitiatory / Ethical / Transcendental}-deficient - named metameme is >dominated by the two others roughly equally; > >Co-dominant - all three metamemes roughly equally dominant; > >I have no idea how the resulting distribution will shake out, barring a >suspicion that a currently co-dominant religion is at an unstable >equlibrium. > >_I_ think you've got a solid first cut at a breakdown (am reluctant to >call it a partition, as it's possibly not exhaustive, and the resulting >subsets are explicitly not disjoint). Actually, I'm not sure that codominant models actually works; I suspect very much that true codominance represents a comparatively short-lived transitional form - your 'unstable equilibrium'. An interesting question to ask (though I don't know if it can be answered) is whether that transition is _guaranteed_ to move forward into new-model-dominant, or whether it can 'fall back' to an old-model-dominant form, whether fundamentally the same or fundamentally different from the pre-transition form. ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)