Sensors Jim Vassilakos (18 Sep 2021 22:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (18 Sep 2021 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (18 Sep 2021 23:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (18 Sep 2021 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (18 Sep 2021 23:16 UTC)
Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Greg Nokes (18 Sep 2021 23:24 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Mark Urbin (19 Sep 2021 14:10 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Bruce Johnson (20 Sep 2021 18:55 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Zane Healy (20 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Mark Urbin (21 Sep 2021 00:45 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 04:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (18 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (19 Sep 2021 00:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Thomas Jones-Low (19 Sep 2021 00:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (19 Sep 2021 00:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (19 Sep 2021 16:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (20 Sep 2021 23:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (21 Sep 2021 16:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (21 Sep 2021 20:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 21:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (21 Sep 2021 22:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (21 Sep 2021 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (24 Sep 2021 19:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2021 17:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (25 Sep 2021 19:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (25 Sep 2021 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (26 Sep 2021 09:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (26 Sep 2021 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (26 Sep 2021 16:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (26 Sep 2021 16:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Bruce Johnson (27 Sep 2021 17:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (27 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
[TML] Dodgie by name, dodgy by nature(?) Alex Goodwin (27 Sep 2021 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (21 Sep 2021 23:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (22 Sep 2021 08:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (22 Sep 2021 14:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors David Shaw (22 Sep 2021 15:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (22 Sep 2021 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Thomas Jones-Low (22 Sep 2021 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (22 Sep 2021 19:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (22 Sep 2021 20:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (22 Sep 2021 22:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (23 Sep 2021 16:05 UTC)
Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 04:27 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Evyn MacDude (23 Sep 2021 04:55 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 06:39 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:54 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 07:15 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:13 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 06:46 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (19 Sep 2021 06:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (19 Sep 2021 16:46 UTC)

Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn 23 Sep 2021 06:57 UTC


On 23Sep2021 1845, Cian Witherspoon - amber.narilka at gmail.com (via
tml list) wrote:
> Correction: the trade chapter is book 2 again. Page 43 (typing from a pdf):
> "extension should instead be based on price with weight as a
> limiting factor."
> Interestingly, this is the same in both 77 and 81, and they have the exact
> same paragraph (81 has it on page 48).
> At the very least, this indicates that cargo was absolutely intended to be
> measured in mass, providing a strong correlation for mass-based ship design.
Traditionally in cargo shipping a 'ton' was a measure of volume, which
just happened to also be about a ton in wieght when it came to 'average'
cargoes. Ships have always been limited by both volume and mass when it
comes to what they can carry, and I see no reason why that wouldn't be
the same for a Traveller spaceship. Thus you build in volume, and assume
that each ton of displacement will carry a ton of cargo, even if it only
fills a small portion of that ton of volume.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>