Sensors Jim Vassilakos (18 Sep 2021 22:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (18 Sep 2021 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (18 Sep 2021 23:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (18 Sep 2021 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (18 Sep 2021 23:16 UTC)
Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Greg Nokes (18 Sep 2021 23:24 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Mark Urbin (19 Sep 2021 14:10 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Bruce Johnson (20 Sep 2021 18:55 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Zane Healy (20 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Mark Urbin (21 Sep 2021 00:45 UTC)
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors] Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 04:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (18 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (19 Sep 2021 00:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Thomas Jones-Low (19 Sep 2021 00:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Evyn MacDude (19 Sep 2021 00:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (19 Sep 2021 16:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (20 Sep 2021 23:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (21 Sep 2021 16:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (21 Sep 2021 20:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 21:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Kurt Feltenberger (21 Sep 2021 22:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (21 Sep 2021 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (21 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (24 Sep 2021 19:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2021 17:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (25 Sep 2021 19:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (25 Sep 2021 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (26 Sep 2021 09:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (26 Sep 2021 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (26 Sep 2021 16:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Nokes.Name (26 Sep 2021 16:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Bruce Johnson (27 Sep 2021 17:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (27 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Timothy Collinson (27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
[TML] Dodgie by name, dodgy by nature(?) Alex Goodwin (27 Sep 2021 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (21 Sep 2021 23:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (22 Sep 2021 08:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (22 Sep 2021 14:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors David Shaw (22 Sep 2021 15:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (22 Sep 2021 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Thomas Jones-Low (22 Sep 2021 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (22 Sep 2021 19:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (22 Sep 2021 20:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (22 Sep 2021 22:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Jim Vassilakos (23 Sep 2021 16:05 UTC)
Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 04:27 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Evyn MacDude (23 Sep 2021 04:55 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 06:39 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:54 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 07:15 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:13 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Cian Witherspoon (23 Sep 2021 06:46 UTC)
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors) Rupert Boleyn (23 Sep 2021 06:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Alex Goodwin (19 Sep 2021 06:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Sensors Phil Pugliese (19 Sep 2021 16:46 UTC)

Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn 18 Sep 2021 23:06 UTC


On 19Sep2021 1103, Kurt Feltenberger - kurt at thepaw.org (via tml list)
wrote:
>
>
> While I liked the potential of the FFS rules (Both TNE and T4), I
> found them too difficult to use without computer assistance, overly
> complex, too detailed in some areas but lacking detail in others,
> among others.  It was, IMO, a noble effort, but the actual impact it
> had on the game was to give it an air of "too complex" without really
> adding anything.  CT and MT allowed good modeling without diving into
> complexity that pretty much demanded some form of spreadsheet or
> dedicated development application.
Aside from having a limited range of pre-built weapons (thus requiring
you to design your own for big military ships), FF&S1 was about as
complex as MT. OF course, compared to CT (even Striker) they were both
rather more fiddly.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>