Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(18 Sep 2021 22:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Evyn MacDude
(18 Sep 2021 22:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Sep 2021 23:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors Rupert Boleyn (18 Sep 2021 23:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Sep 2021 23:16 UTC)
|
Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Greg Nokes
(18 Sep 2021 23:24 UTC)
|
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Mark Urbin
(19 Sep 2021 14:10 UTC)
|
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Bruce Johnson
(20 Sep 2021 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Zane Healy
(20 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
|
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Mark Urbin
(21 Sep 2021 00:45 UTC)
|
Re: Crunchy vs Squishy [WAS: Re: [TML] Sensors]
Phil Pugliese
(21 Sep 2021 04:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Evyn MacDude
(19 Sep 2021 00:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Thomas Jones-Low
(19 Sep 2021 00:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Evyn MacDude
(19 Sep 2021 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(19 Sep 2021 16:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(20 Sep 2021 23:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(21 Sep 2021 16:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(21 Sep 2021 20:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(21 Sep 2021 21:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Sep 2021 22:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Rupert Boleyn
(21 Sep 2021 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(21 Sep 2021 23:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(24 Sep 2021 19:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Timothy Collinson
(25 Sep 2021 17:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(25 Sep 2021 19:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Nokes.Name
(25 Sep 2021 21:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(26 Sep 2021 09:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Nokes.Name
(26 Sep 2021 15:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(26 Sep 2021 16:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Nokes.Name
(26 Sep 2021 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Timothy Collinson
(27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Bruce Johnson
(27 Sep 2021 17:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Sep 2021 23:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Timothy Collinson
(27 Sep 2021 07:00 UTC)
|
[TML] Dodgie by name, dodgy by nature(?)
Alex Goodwin
(27 Sep 2021 19:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Rupert Boleyn
(21 Sep 2021 23:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(22 Sep 2021 08:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(22 Sep 2021 14:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
David Shaw
(22 Sep 2021 15:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(22 Sep 2021 16:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Thomas Jones-Low
(22 Sep 2021 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(22 Sep 2021 19:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Rupert Boleyn
(22 Sep 2021 20:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(22 Sep 2021 22:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Jim Vassilakos
(23 Sep 2021 16:05 UTC)
|
Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Cian Witherspoon
(23 Sep 2021 04:27 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Evyn MacDude
(23 Sep 2021 04:55 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Cian Witherspoon
(23 Sep 2021 06:39 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Rupert Boleyn
(23 Sep 2021 06:54 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Cian Witherspoon
(23 Sep 2021 07:15 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Rupert Boleyn
(23 Sep 2021 06:13 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Cian Witherspoon
(23 Sep 2021 06:46 UTC)
|
Re: Cian Rants About dTons (Was Re: [TML] Sensors)
Rupert Boleyn
(23 Sep 2021 06:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Alex Goodwin
(19 Sep 2021 06:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Sensors
Phil Pugliese
(19 Sep 2021 16:46 UTC)
|
On 19Sep2021 1103, Kurt Feltenberger - kurt at thepaw.org (via tml list) wrote: > > > While I liked the potential of the FFS rules (Both TNE and T4), I > found them too difficult to use without computer assistance, overly > complex, too detailed in some areas but lacking detail in others, > among others. It was, IMO, a noble effort, but the actual impact it > had on the game was to give it an air of "too complex" without really > adding anything. CT and MT allowed good modeling without diving into > complexity that pretty much demanded some form of spreadsheet or > dedicated development application. Aside from having a limited range of pre-built weapons (thus requiring you to design your own for big military ships), FF&S1 was about as complex as MT. OF course, compared to CT (even Striker) they were both rather more fiddly. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>