Heat Sinking Jeffrey Schwartz (13 Jun 2014 17:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Kelly St. Clair (13 Jun 2014 17:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Jeffrey Schwartz (13 Jun 2014 17:37 UTC)
RE: [TML] Heat Sinking Anthony Jackson (13 Jun 2014 22:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Bruce Johnson (13 Jun 2014 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking greg@xxxxxx (13 Jun 2014 22:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Richard Aiken (14 Jun 2014 15:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking sjard (14 Jun 2014 23:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Richard Aiken (15 Jun 2014 10:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking sjard (15 Jun 2014 12:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Richard Aiken (15 Jun 2014 13:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking David Shaw (15 Jun 2014 17:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking sjard (16 Jun 2014 00:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Richard Aiken (16 Jun 2014 17:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking David Shaw (16 Jun 2014 18:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Heat Sinking sjard (17 Jun 2014 00:35 UTC)

Re: [TML] Heat Sinking Kelly St. Clair 13 Jun 2014 17:25 UTC

On 6/13/2014 10:10 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote:

> If you've got the ability to make room temp superconductors, I can see
> them developing highly super-magnetocaloric materials.
> You'd let the material heat up (ie, lots of molecular motion) and then
> push electric current through it, and lock the molecules in place,
> thus making heat "stop"

Cute, but the /other/ Three Laws* tell me, 1, that heat has to go
SOMEWHERE, and 2, generating the current will inevitably produce MORE heat.

(* Which I still remember in the form of a song from "The Wiz":  "You
can't win child, you can't break even, you can't get out of the game.")

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
kellys@efn.org