Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(09 Jun 2014 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(09 Jun 2014 20:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Derek Wildstar
(12 Jun 2014 02:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans Timothy Collinson (12 Jun 2014 13:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(12 Jun 2014 14:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(12 Jun 2014 16:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(12 Jun 2014 20:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Tim
(13 Jun 2014 03:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(13 Jun 2014 06:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Joelle Clark
(13 Jun 2014 12:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(13 Jun 2014 20:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(13 Jun 2014 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(13 Jun 2014 20:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Joelle Clark
(13 Jun 2014 20:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(13 Jun 2014 21:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(14 Jun 2014 06:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Postmark
(14 Jun 2014 09:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(14 Jun 2014 12:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(16 Jun 2014 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(16 Jun 2014 19:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(16 Jun 2014 20:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Jun 2014 13:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(17 Jun 2014 18:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(17 Jun 2014 19:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Jun 2014 20:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(17 Jun 2014 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Jun 2014 20:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kelly St. Clair
(17 Jun 2014 21:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(17 Jun 2014 21:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kelly St. Clair
(17 Jun 2014 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(17 Jun 2014 22:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(17 Jun 2014 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 20:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Jun 2014 21:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 22:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Postmark
(18 Jun 2014 22:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(18 Jun 2014 22:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 22:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
David Shaw
(18 Jun 2014 22:22 UTC)
|
Rum Rations; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jun 2014 23:27 UTC)
|
Re: Rum Rations; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Patrice
(20 Jun 2014 01:32 UTC)
|
Re: Rum Rations; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Peter Berghold
(20 Jun 2014 15:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2014 23:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(18 Jun 2014 04:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jun 2014 14:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kurt Feltenberger
(18 Jun 2014 14:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2014 10:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2014 10:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Jun 2014 11:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2014 13:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Evyn MacDude
(20 Jun 2014 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2014 07:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Rupert Boleyn
(22 Jun 2014 04:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(22 Jun 2014 06:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 13:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 14:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Rupert Boleyn
(23 Jun 2014 19:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(24 Jun 2014 01:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(24 Jun 2014 06:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(24 Jun 2014 06:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(24 Jun 2014 20:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Tim
(25 Jun 2014 01:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(25 Jun 2014 08:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Tim
(25 Jun 2014 12:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(25 Jun 2014 12:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(25 Jun 2014 12:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(25 Jun 2014 12:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Tim
(26 Jun 2014 05:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(27 Jun 2014 04:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Knapp
(27 Jun 2014 06:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Tim
(27 Jun 2014 12:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 20:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(18 Jun 2014 13:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jun 2014 14:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(18 Jun 2014 15:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jun 2014 16:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(18 Jun 2014 20:28 UTC)
|
Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jun 2014 23:33 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(19 Jun 2014 00:07 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Postmark
(19 Jun 2014 06:43 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Phil Pugliese
(19 Jun 2014 11:17 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(19 Jun 2014 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2014 11:04 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(20 Jun 2014 14:06 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Greg Nokes
(20 Jun 2014 15:18 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Jun 2014 02:04 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Timothy Collinson
(21 Jun 2014 12:53 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 12:38 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 12:39 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 Jun 2014 12:55 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 13:26 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Andrew Staples
(23 Jun 2014 13:39 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 Jun 2014 13:43 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(23 Jun 2014 13:52 UTC)
|
Re: Crews Quarters; was Re: [TML] Deck plans
William Ewing
(24 Jun 2014 00:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Richard Aiken
(13 Jun 2014 14:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(13 Jun 2014 16:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Jeffrey Schwartz
(13 Jun 2014 16:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Deck plans
Bruce Johnson
(13 Jun 2014 17:57 UTC)
|
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 03:05, Derek Wildstar <xxxxxx@prismnet.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Timothy Collinson <xxxxxx@port.ac.uk> wrote: >> I'm using the rule of thumb that says deck plans should have twice the number of squares of the tonnage. > > That’s basically correct. A standard deck square is 1.5 meters square and 3 meters tall: > 1.5m x 1.5m x 3m = 6.75m^3. Two squares is therefore 13.5 cubic meters. > > The Traveller volume standard is a ton of liquid hydrogen; the density varies with temperature, but is typically between 70.85 and 71.00 kg/m3. That works out to just over 14 cubic meters per ton (14.08 to 14.11). Slush hydrogen has a density of about 85 kg/m3, which would put a ton at 11.76 cubic meters. > > Slush hydrogen is a mixture of solid, liquid, and gas at the triple point. For hydrogen, this is a lower temperature and higher density than liquid hydrogen - about 14K (-259C) and and 7 kPa (about 1 PSI, or about 1/14th of an atmosphere). > > IMTU, I figure that typical Traveller starships aim to keep their fuel as slush hydrogen at the triple point, and provide about 15% extra space in the tankage to accommodate chillers and to contain temperature excursions. > >> So a 400-ton ship would have 800 one point five metre squares. > > Yep. > >> So if I have four decks of 200 squares and a fuel deck (not shown on the plans) as well. That's NOT a 400 ton ship but a 500 ton ship, right? > > Right. A 400-ton J-1 ship will need 40 tons (or 80 squares) of fuel. > Excellent. Thank you for that. I think I'm going to have to admit that my "2000-ton" ship is actually a 3000-ton ship. (I had another count of squares last night and found some more fuel tanks in the side view that I'd forgotten about in the plan view.). Or remove some squares. Except of course that the space is all utilised. :-( I'd be happy enough to just say it's a 3000-ton ship except that that means I can't design it under T5 which only goes up to 2400-tons, saying that this covers Adventure Class Ships and anything bigger is a Battle Class Ship (but has no rules for - I assume they're coming). I did double check that I had the fuel requirements right. Jump-4 and 12 weeks of operation I think I had as 1048 tons of fuel or so. So that needs 2096 squares for fuel. I think I had 1200 formally. So need another 800. Of course now it's a 3000-ton ship, I shall have to redo all the requirements anyway. Which will of course then impact the size and contents. <sigh> It might be easier to start again. Perhaps I should start with something I know like the Beowulf which has known solutions. tc