annual (or not) maintenance Timothy Collinson (06 Jan 2021 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Ethan McKinney (06 Jan 2021 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Timothy Collinson (06 Jan 2021 20:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Thomas RUX (06 Jan 2021 20:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Timothy Collinson (06 Jan 2021 20:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Peter Vernon (06 Jan 2021 21:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2021 02:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Rupert Boleyn (07 Jan 2021 06:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2021 16:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Thomas RUX (07 Jan 2021 00:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Jeff Zeitlin (07 Jan 2021 11:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2021 16:53 UTC)
Re: annual (or not)maintenance Charles Hensley (08 Jan 2021 05:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: annual (or not)maintenance Phil Pugliese (08 Jan 2021 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: annual (or not)maintenance Timothy Collinson (08 Jan 2021 11:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: annual (ornot)maintenance Charles Hensley (09 Jan 2021 17:33 UTC)
RE: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance ewan@xxxxxx (10 Jan 2021 01:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Timothy Collinson (10 Jan 2021 17:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Kurt Feltenberger (11 Jan 2021 00:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (11 Jan 2021 00:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (11 Jan 2021 12:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not) maintenance Phil Pugliese (11 Jan 2021 12:35 UTC)
Cutting Edge = 'Bleeding Edge"? Phil Pugliese (11 Jan 2021 12:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutting Edge = 'Bleeding Edge"? Cian Witherspoon (11 Jan 2021 16:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutting Edge = 'Bleeding Edge"? Phil Pugliese (11 Jan 2021 20:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Charles Hensley (15 Jan 2021 00:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Kurt Feltenberger (15 Jan 2021 00:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Ethan McKinney (15 Jan 2021 04:30 UTC)
RE: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance ewan@xxxxxx (16 Jan 2021 16:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Timothy Collinson (16 Jan 2021 17:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Rupert Boleyn (16 Jan 2021 22:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance kaladorn@xxxxxx (31 Jan 2021 18:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Timothy Collinson (02 Feb 2021 09:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2021 14:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Timothy Collinson (02 Feb 2021 17:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Phil Pugliese (16 Jan 2021 19:19 UTC)
RE: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance ewan@xxxxxx (16 Jan 2021 22:30 UTC)

Re: [TML] annual (or not)maintenance Rupert Boleyn 16 Jan 2021 22:48 UTC


On 17Jan2021 0611, Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson at port.ac.uk
(via tml list) wrote:

>> And showing that good design against required specification really  >> is the thing with the 2^nd longest production run of >>any military
 >> aircraft (the C130 above being the longest) I give you the: >> *
Antonov AN-2 >> Entering service in ’40s and still in active military
service >> today > Wow!
The old An-2 is an amazing design. A biplane, well after eveyone else
had decided that biplanes were a thing of the past, it's simple, robust,
easy to fly, carries a decent payload a reasonable range, and has an
exceptionally low stall speed (so low that in strong headwinds landing
it can be tricky, in fact). Some things they are not: comfortable,
quiet, economical.

They're a really good example of the practical sort of designs the
Soviets came up with in the 40s-60s, before the stagnation set in.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>