We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2020 02:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2020 02:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2020 08:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Oct 2020 12:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Oct 2020 12:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(18 Oct 2020 14:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2020 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(18 Oct 2020 14:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2020 15:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2020 17:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(18 Oct 2020 17:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2020 21:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Oct 2020 22:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(18 Oct 2020 22:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(19 Oct 2020 00:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(19 Oct 2020 02:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Cian Witherspoon
(19 Oct 2020 03:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Kelly St. Clair
(19 Oct 2020 03:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(19 Oct 2020 07:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Kelly St. Clair
(19 Oct 2020 18:08 UTC)
|
Traveller simulations of government (was: We await our AI overlords...)
David Johnson
(19 Oct 2020 14:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Thomas Jones-Low
(19 Oct 2020 14:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(19 Oct 2020 15:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords... David Johnson (19 Oct 2020 19:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(19 Oct 2020 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2020 20:18 UTC)
|
[CORRECTION] Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2020 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: [CORRECTION] Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(20 Oct 2020 00:16 UTC)
|
Re: [CORRECTION] Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Timothy Collinson
(20 Oct 2020 07:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Timothy Collinson
(19 Oct 2020 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2020 18:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(18 Oct 2020 18:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Oct 2020 20:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
David Johnson
(18 Oct 2020 21:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Oct 2020 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] We await our AI overlords...
Phil Pugliese
(19 Oct 2020 17:22 UTC)
|
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > It's a really useful set of information, in a really compact form, but it is of necessity limited in detail. In-universe, I assume that the IISS and TAS expect that it'll do for long enough at a Traveller who needs more information can find out for themselves, on the ground. Agreed. What I don't understand is why some folks don't treat randomly generated physical characteristics like "star type" and "satellite orbits" in the same way. They're meant to inform in-character non-experts who are simply "passing through" and aren't going to seem any more effective as models or simulations to a "real-world" astronomer or planetary scientist than "government type" does to a "real-world" political scientist or international relations scholar. Cheers, David -- "In short, though Traveller is the SFRPG which most projects the atmosphere of a hard-science fiction universe, it is science ~fantasy~. However, I imagine no one (least of all me) will let that hinder his enjoyment of the game." - Greg Costikyan, "Traveller as Science Fantasy," ~The Space Gamer~ #49, March 1982