MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 08:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Rupert Boleyn
(13 Oct 2020 09:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 13:04 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
ewan@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 13:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 17:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Rupert Boleyn
(13 Oct 2020 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 18:16 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
ewan@xxxxxx
(13 Oct 2020 20:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(14 Oct 2020 06:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Rupert Boleyn
(14 Oct 2020 06:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(14 Oct 2020 07:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(14 Oct 2020 15:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(14 Oct 2020 16:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(14 Oct 2020 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(14 Oct 2020 19:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(15 Oct 2020 01:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(15 Oct 2020 02:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points Rupert Boleyn (15 Oct 2020 05:29 UTC)
|
"Insanity" was Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(15 Oct 2020 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: "Insanity" was Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(15 Oct 2020 19:16 UTC)
|
Re: "Insanity" was Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(15 Oct 2020 19:21 UTC)
|
Re: "Insanity" was Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
James Catchpole
(15 Oct 2020 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: "Insanity" was Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Timothy Collinson
(15 Oct 2020 20:39 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
ewan@xxxxxx
(14 Oct 2020 23:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Rupert Boleyn
(14 Oct 2020 23:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(15 Oct 2020 16:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(15 Oct 2020 18:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(15 Oct 2020 19:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(16 Oct 2020 00:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Cian Witherspoon
(15 Oct 2020 22:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Phil Pugliese
(15 Oct 2020 16:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] MegaTraveller Brownie Points
Rupert Boleyn
(13 Oct 2020 17:40 UTC)
|
On 15Oct2020 1525, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote: > It's like my dad working in a prison teaching small engine repair. > Prison rules meant workshops had ONE set of tools and they had to be > accounted for after each day. Sometimes they break. Dad went into > stores, found 8 or 10 sets of everything. He asked about that - > turned out if you didn't spend all your budget, it was assumed you > didn't need the extra in coming years so they cut it (so when you > need it, you could well not get it!). So they always bought new stuff > even beyond needs just to keep their budget allocation. > Insanity. That's completely normal. I grew up in a rural area, on an unsealed road running off a more major (sealed) one. Every couple of years the first few hundred yards of our road would get resealed - far more often than it needed, while the rest would stay unsealed and full of potholes. The same went for all the side-roads in the county. The re-sealing always happened just before the new year's budget, and was the county using up any roading budget surplus. And why a few hundred yards on each side-road? Because that was how far you could see down the roads from the main road, so they could point to these nice 'sealed' side-roads should anyone come wanting to see how well the money was spent. When the national government forced the amalgamation of the rural counties into fewer much bigger ones ours was merged with the nearby city, an unpopular move with the county's inhabitants. The county blew all its cash that last year on sealing the side-roads. First time they ever did anything useful for their rate payers. Still, better than the city, which charges rates but unless you're in the city proper about all you get for them is use of its library - in all the ~35 years since the county was joined to it, that side-road (where my parent still live) has never been resealed, not even those first few hundred yards. More people live on it, there's more traffic, and rates are higher, no councillor lives there, so it doesn't matter, see? When your infrastructure spending is worse than that of a small, mostly broke, rural county, and you're a big and expanding city, that's insanity. Yet not spending on infrastructure seems to be a thing in this past half-century. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>