refuelling... not at a gas giant
Timothy Collinson
(10 Oct 2020 19:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 00:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 05:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 06:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 06:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 06:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 07:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Kelly St. Clair (11 Oct 2020 07:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(11 Oct 2020 17:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(11 Oct 2020 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Phil Pugliese
(12 Oct 2020 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Cian Witherspoon
(12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas Jones-Low
(12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(12 Oct 2020 20:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 02:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 03:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 04:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 06:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Timothy Collinson
(11 Oct 2020 12:49 UTC)
|
On 10/11/2020 12:10 AM, Rupert Boleyn wrote: > One tonne of liquid hydrogen takes up forteen cubic metres of volume. > Nine tonnes of water include one tonne of hydrogen, and has a volume of > nine cubic metres. You get about 1.55 times as much hydrogen into the > same volume, but the mass per quantity of hydrogen is nine times as > great. In CT, MgT and a number of other rule sets spaceships care about > volume, not mass, so water is useful if the referee is willing to go > with it. The downside is that it's very definitely unrefined fuel, even > if the ref is generous (I simply disallow using water as jump fuel), and > carrying it and then refining it requires a refinery/purifier, time, and > a tank to hold the water as well as one to hold fuel. On the gripping hand, water is /much/ easier to handle than lHyd, as it can quite literally be stored at room temperature, is not explosive when allowed to warm up and mix with air, etc etc. -- --------------- Kelly St. Clair xxxxxx@efn.org