refuelling... not at a gas giant
Timothy Collinson
(10 Oct 2020 19:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 00:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 05:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 06:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 06:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 06:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 07:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Kelly St. Clair
(11 Oct 2020 07:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(11 Oct 2020 17:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Rupert Boleyn
(11 Oct 2020 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(11 Oct 2020 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Phil Pugliese
(12 Oct 2020 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Cian Witherspoon
(12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas Jones-Low
(12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Thomas RUX
(12 Oct 2020 20:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 02:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 Oct 2020 03:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
James Catchpole
(11 Oct 2020 04:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 06:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant
Timothy Collinson
(11 Oct 2020 12:49 UTC)
|
On 11Oct2020 1556, James Catchpole - jlcatchpole at googlemail.com (via tml list) wrote: > I agree with all the salient points you make, but I think you have > made a mistake in your working out, as 1.56 + 9.78 <> 14... > > 14 / 9 = 1.56, rounded to 2dp. > > 14 × 8 / 9 = 12.44, rounded to 2dp. > > So, the oxygen is 12.44 tonnes, taking up 0.78 DTons if cryogenically > cooled. You're right. Not sure where that error came from. > > I would add that cryogenically cooling the oxygen is trivial if you > can cool H2 sufficiently to make a liquid, only needing to be kept > below 90K at 1 atm, rather than the 33K maximum for H2, or 20K at 1 > atm. Indeed, liquid H2 is cold enough to freeze 02... Sure, but you still have to do it. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>