The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Thomas RUX (28 Sep 2020 22:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2020 01:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2020 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2020 19:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 Sep 2020 07:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (29 Sep 2020 07:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2020 19:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (30 Sep 2020 02:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 Sep 2020 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (30 Sep 2020 09:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Oct 2020 01:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (01 Oct 2020 03:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Oct 2020 07:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (01 Oct 2020 15:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Oct 2020 17:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (01 Oct 2020 20:45 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Oct 2020 17:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn (02 Oct 2020 22:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Oct 2020 23:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (02 Oct 2020 23:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Timothy Collinson (03 Oct 2020 05:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (03 Oct 2020 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Oct 2020 07:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (03 Oct 2020 06:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Oct 2020 07:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (03 Oct 2020 08:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn (03 Oct 2020 07:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Bruce Johnson (02 Oct 2020 16:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn (02 Oct 2020 22:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Phil Pugliese (03 Oct 2020 00:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn (02 Oct 2020 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn (03 Oct 2020 01:54 UTC)

Re: [TML] The Compleat Starport by J. Andrew Keith Update 2 Rupert Boleyn 03 Oct 2020 07:38 UTC


On 03Oct2020 1954, Phil Pugliese - philpugliese at yahoo.com (via tml
list) wrote:

> Hmmmm.  > Then I guess I don't recall what the string of numbers was called >
but it must have been called something? > In any case it's odd that
'Trillion Credit Sqd' only used the > mainworld stats. This might've
been where I first got the idea that > the stats applied to the whole
system & not just the 'mainworld' > (whatever the definition of that
term really is).
TCS had to only use the mainworld stats, because that's all GDW could
assume the players had access to. After all, sector/subsector maps only
have the basic data.

Actually, TCS came out in 1981 and I'm not sure the other stats existed
back then, aside from "Gas Giant? Yes/No". Book 6: Scouts in 1983 would
seem to be when such things as secondary worlds turn up. Even then
population is still just the exponent, with no multiplier.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>