On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:17:54 +0100, "Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson at port.ac.uk (via tml list)" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance Traveller: >> >> (Note: _anyone_ can write and publish material that can be used with Your >> Favorite Version of Traveller - that is, after all, _exactly_ what >> Freelance Traveller is all about. An Author, with a capital A in The Rant, >> is someone who is doing so _for money from an official licensee_. Even >> > > >I have, occasionally, wondered about the boundaries of this vis a vis >publishing with TAS. I would do (I do do) my utmost to keep in line with >what's gone before. Not to be honest, that I really push the boundaries. My interpretation of the TAS/DM's Guild/etc., on DTRPG is that it's a mechanism to allow you to _use_ (i.e., make explicit reference to) Canon and other TAS/DMG/etc. material in your work (in exchange for giving a hefty chunk of the price tag to the Canon-owner), but that your work does not _become_ Canon thereby. >But no one appears to police anything I publish as a "TAS" thing and I'm >not sure they would as I don't imagine anything I write - let's say the >details for the planet Spume in Ashfall - becomes any form of canon. >Although as I understand the licencing, anyone can take what I've done and >use it in their own Traveller publications under the TAS licence. Yes, that's a (major) part of the terms, as I understand them. >I would be chuffed if they did. (Whether a March Harrier thing or a >Freelance Traveller thing). I'm not aware of anything that has so far done >this but nor would I be surprised or put out if someone wrote, for example, >their own entirely different version of, for example, Spume. >So perhaps there's something between an author and an Author. We need a >third case! Nope. "Author", with the explicit capital, is a yes/no sort of thing; if you're not an Author, you're a Player. _All_ Players are, in one way or another, contributors to Our Game; it is merely that some Players are more prolific in their contributions than others. >I've definitely used FT things (like your Rikarunasha's Peers [1] and the >Dhe game [2] most recently) at TravCon but now I think about it, I'm >struggling to recall something that I've included in a March Harrier >Publication that originated with someone else (outside of the standard >Mongoose publications). I'[m not quite sure whether that's a good thing or >a bad thing. It's probably just a thing and given how much I think I'd >like my work to get reused, perhaps I should consider it more. While I certainly approve of using material that others have chosen to share with the community, it shouldn't be looked at as an _exchange_; community content is for sharing and using as needed/wanted, not a 'barter' situation, any more than publication in a magazine, whether FT or JTAS, is. >[1] https://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/consgoods/rikarunasha.html > >[2] https://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/culture/games/dhe.html ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)