Re: [TML]A question for the panel regarding jump drive and relativity Thomas Jones-Low (07 Sep 2020 16:57 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)

Re: [TML]A question for the panel regarding jump drive and relativity Thomas Jones-Low 07 Sep 2020 16:57 UTC

On 9/7/2020 11:41 AM, xxxxxx@quibell.org.uk wrote:
> But Jump doesn’t take into account velocity within it. Velocity is only relative to the two places you jump from.
>
> You don’t accelerate in Jump. And Jump take 7 days.
>
> So in your example, you jump out (and arrive 7 days later) accelerate 100m/s towards the system you just jumped from (which will take some more time) then jump back (and arrive 7 days later) exiting at the same speed you accelerated to when you jumped.
>
> Which means you arrive back in the system you left 14 days after you initially jumped. Not before. Because 2 jumps take 14 days.
>
> That's why I say I can never work out how you do it; because at no point are you travelling back in time, even though jump is faster then the speed of light.
>
> It takes a fixed time to jump. When you enter jump space you come out of it after you went in, you don't come out of it before.
>

	The problem is once you drag relativity into this you have to ask "jump takes 7
days" according to whom? The person in jump, the person in the starting system,
or the person in the ending system? The relative velocity of the person in jump
to the starting and ending system is very important.

	Now one of the solutions to the conflict of "FTL, Relativity, Causality pick
two" is to assume Jump Space is a fixed frame of reference. Like you do above.
And that breaks the using Jump Space as Time Travel.

--
         Thomas Jones-Low
Work:	xxxxxx@softstart.com
Home:   xxxxxx@gmail.com