Starports
Thomas RUX
(18 Aug 2020 19:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(19 Aug 2020 15:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(19 Aug 2020 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Kelly St. Clair
(19 Aug 2020 17:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(19 Aug 2020 17:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(20 Aug 2020 22:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(21 Aug 2020 10:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(21 Aug 2020 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(21 Aug 2020 16:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(21 Aug 2020 18:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 02:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(22 Aug 2020 02:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 06:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 Aug 2020 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 Aug 2020 14:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 16:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(22 Aug 2020 21:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 03:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 16:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 18:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 23:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 00:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(24 Aug 2020 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(24 Aug 2020 22:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(25 Aug 2020 01:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2020 03:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Aug 2020 10:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2020 02:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Aug 2020 10:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 18:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 11:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Aug 2020 12:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 17:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Aug 2020 18:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(22 Aug 2020 09:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(22 Aug 2020 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(22 Aug 2020 16:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(22 Aug 2020 21:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 03:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 16:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 18:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports Alex Goodwin (23 Aug 2020 05:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 09:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(23 Aug 2020 09:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(28 Aug 2020 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Timothy Collinson
(28 Aug 2020 16:53 UTC)
|
Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Alex Goodwin
(28 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Thomas RUX
(29 Aug 2020 02:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Kenneth Barns
(29 Aug 2020 23:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(26 Aug 2020 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(26 Aug 2020 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(26 Aug 2020 18:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
hemdian
(19 Aug 2020 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(19 Aug 2020 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(19 Aug 2020 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(19 Aug 2020 20:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(19 Aug 2020 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas Jones-Low
(19 Aug 2020 21:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(19 Aug 2020 22:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(19 Aug 2020 22:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(20 Aug 2020 02:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(20 Aug 2020 04:22 UTC)
|
On 23/8/20 7:32 am, Thomas RUX wrote: > <snip> >> There we will have to agree to disagree - for consistency with prior >> PA:VT use, I've ruled (and used) that the previous "take" had already >> been fully exploited in the corresponding scan. I didn't bother coming >> up with reasons, and no one asked. >> >> If you want more data above and beyond that previous scan, you need to >> go take another look-see (although even a low-grade fool will use the >> prior sensor take to guide their next search(es) ). > My USN rating was Sonar Technician Submarines and my passive sonar equipment received al the sound energy in the water. On the stack I would be listening to the noises trying to detect anything that sounded like a ship's screw/propeller and looking at the Bearing Time Record (BTR) that used supposedly gun powder impregnated paper to record information to see if there was a line indicating a noise that was probably below my hearing as a back-up. We had three analysis systems that were being watched for signals that the operators and the passive systems did not detect. Actually, we had four but the last one was used to refine sound characteristics. Unfortunately, all my boats were built in the 1960s so we only had the BTR paper, reel to reel tapes, logs, and the a similarly impregnated paper from the fourth analysis system as permanent records. > > A spaceship's or starship's passive sensors are gathering all sorts of energy that I would think is processed through the ship's computer using a software package as well as storing the raw data. In the case of Da Boote the search parameters would be setup to determine any sources of fuel. Once in a system the sensors are still collecting information that may or may not be analyzed at the time. Da Famous Tom B, For reasons probably relating to lack of sufficient coffee, I read that as "curried gun powder-impregnated". My major concern for ruling as I did was having enough Early Installment Weirdness already, given how I've spruiked rational knowability elsewhere. As with Jonesy below, I wanted _knowing how to drive_ the toys to be at least as important as _having_ the fancy toys. In this particular case, they had civspec sensors (-2 to sensor rolls) on top of a quirk adding a further -1 to such rolls. Per the MGT2 survey rules, scan time was 2D6 days. If some wombat hadn't already blundered past and ruled the other way, I'd certainly bow to your professional background (and the cinematic example of Ronald "Jonesy" Jones in _The Hunt For Red October_). I'm not sure if Badass-Moustache was explicitly looking for fuel sources _per se_ - he just quit looking as soon as he had enough evidence (using JOAT 3 to stand in for science (planetology) ) to conclusively infer at least one fuel source. The exception was discovering the rogue gas dwarf Teapot (Solomani Rim 2530) - he had managed to get a Survey Index of 12 from long range, but I wanted to mix things up a bit (as he was scanning a theoretically-empty parsec), so gave him 8 sensor blips that _might_ be something and had to be further refined. So Badass-Moustache dug out all the accumulated data and conclusions from Milford's Run, strained it though The Moustache Of Power, and had to re-analyse those blips in light of his accumulated experience, data and conclusions. Kaladorn, PA:VT took place in 2125-2126 AD - a little over a hundred years from now in an ATL, after a different set of global crises and breaking out into space big time c 2050s (gravitics, reactionless thrusters), Terrans becoming a major race in 2088, and "reaching the stars, to find humanity already there" in 2097. > >>> <snip> >>> >>>> As for not being able to find a "system contents table" in the MGT2 >>>> core, you're not alone. >>> What a relief to know that I have not simply overlooked the table. Thank you for the information. >> Glad you said that. If you said "going crazy" or the like, I may not >> have been as much help. :) > I am a bit crazy since I volunteered to serve on a ship that purposely sank itself and resurfaced at least one more time than it sank. ;-) No comment. ;-) > >>> <snip> >> >> Looks like, needing to RTFM, I sit corrected. As T5 is the most recent >> Word of Miller, what does that say? > T5 PDF Core Book 3 Worlds and Adventures p. 24 WorldGen Basics appears to me has a similar table as the one in CT LBB 3. Type X: Quality None; Yards blank space; Repairs No; Downport No; High Port blank space; Bases No Bases. > > T5 PDF Core Book 3 Worlds and Adventures p. 24 Fuel at Starports and Spaceports Table has a note for Starports Types E** and X** and Spaceports H** and Y**. The note is **Unrefined may be available as local environmental water or ice: Raw Fuel (Water) from oceans. Raw Fuel (Ice) from Ice Caps or Snowpack, Ice Asteroids or Comets. Raw Fuel (Gas) from Gas Giants. > > Tom Rux > ----- > Thanks for digging that up, Tom. I definitely sit corrected.