Starports
Thomas RUX
(18 Aug 2020 19:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(19 Aug 2020 15:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(19 Aug 2020 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Kelly St. Clair
(19 Aug 2020 17:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(19 Aug 2020 17:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(20 Aug 2020 22:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(21 Aug 2020 10:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(21 Aug 2020 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(21 Aug 2020 16:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(21 Aug 2020 18:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 02:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports Rupert Boleyn (22 Aug 2020 02:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 06:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 Aug 2020 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 Aug 2020 14:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Aug 2020 16:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(22 Aug 2020 21:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 03:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 16:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 18:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 23:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 00:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(24 Aug 2020 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(24 Aug 2020 22:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(25 Aug 2020 01:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2020 03:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Aug 2020 10:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2020 02:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Aug 2020 10:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2020 18:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 11:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Aug 2020 12:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 17:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Aug 2020 18:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(26 Aug 2020 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(22 Aug 2020 09:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(22 Aug 2020 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(22 Aug 2020 16:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(22 Aug 2020 21:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 03:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(23 Aug 2020 16:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 18:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(23 Aug 2020 05:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2020 09:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(23 Aug 2020 09:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(28 Aug 2020 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Timothy Collinson
(28 Aug 2020 16:53 UTC)
|
Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Alex Goodwin
(28 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Thomas RUX
(29 Aug 2020 02:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Interstellar Wars Timelines (was Starports)
Kenneth Barns
(29 Aug 2020 23:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(26 Aug 2020 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Alex Goodwin
(26 Aug 2020 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(26 Aug 2020 18:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
hemdian
(19 Aug 2020 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Rupert Boleyn
(19 Aug 2020 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(19 Aug 2020 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(19 Aug 2020 20:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Jeff Zeitlin
(19 Aug 2020 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas Jones-Low
(19 Aug 2020 21:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(19 Aug 2020 22:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(19 Aug 2020 22:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Thomas RUX
(20 Aug 2020 02:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Starports
Phil Pugliese
(20 Aug 2020 04:22 UTC)
|
On 22Aug2020 1424, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote: > That's a broad classification. I was thinking more local to a system > itself ('there's a damaged freighter with a hazardous cargo being > salvaged in orbit x of planet y and all ships are required to > maintain at least 1000 km clearance' or 'the primary in this system > is experiencing significant coronal mass ejections at this time; > System Guard recommends all vessels within 100 solar diameters review > their radiation protocols and equipment, have appropriate protective > measures immediately available, etc') NOTAMS (in an nautical setting) > would include some bulletins about navigation aids > (lights/radio/ranges/etc), weather warnings, issues with anchorages > or harborages, spills, vessels stuck, adrift, derelict, etc, as well > as any areas closed to civilian traffic. In a Notice To All Spacers > (NOTAMS), there might be bulletins about navigational aids, system > emergency channels/stations, space weather events, navigational > hazards, port issues, spills, stuck/adrift/derelict vehicles, areas > prohibited to civilians, information about safe orbits around various > planets and satellites, a pointer to local information services and > dockage, etc. I would expect that on arrival you'd receive such notifications from the system's traffic control, probably from a simple repeating message relayed by beacons on a standard frequency. Major cautions would be dumped into the mail systems to be spread to and posted at neighbouring worlds. But then I'm not super-keen on the SPA model from GURPS Starports - I consider it too intrusive and it makes the customs checks on spaceships that haven't yet landed probably a breech of Imperial territoriality - and those are a common mention in Traveller adventures, etc. IMTU the Imperial SPA inspects starports to make sure that they're obeying Imperial law and treaties, and that worlds aren't doing naughty things like imposing selective import tarrifs, etc. or refusing basic starport services to ships for no good reason, charging some ships more than others, and so on. They probably also 'strongly encourage' ports to properly report shipping hazards, etc. to neighbouring worlds (by pointing out that poor compliance would mean an unfortunate re-designation as an amber zone by the IISS and/or TAS). -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>