System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (09 Aug 2020 19:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Thomas Jones-Low (09 Aug 2020 20:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Jeff Zeitlin (09 Aug 2020 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) greg caires (09 Aug 2020 23:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Jeff Zeitlin (10 Aug 2020 00:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) greg caires (10 Aug 2020 00:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (10 Aug 2020 00:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Timothy Collinson (10 Aug 2020 07:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Greg Nokes (10 Aug 2020 17:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (10 Aug 2020 00:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Thomas RUX (10 Aug 2020 02:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (10 Aug 2020 02:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Thomas RUX (10 Aug 2020 14:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Thomas Jones-Low (10 Aug 2020 03:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) Greg Nokes (10 Aug 2020 04:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (10 Aug 2020 06:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) kaladorn@xxxxxx (10 Aug 2020 06:00 UTC)

Re: [TML] System Guard - Search and Rescue (SG-SR) greg caires 10 Aug 2020 00:39 UTC

Thank you

-30-
Caires sends via iPhone

> On Aug 9, 2020, at 7:36 PM, Jeff Zeitlin <xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 18:04:06 -0500, greg caires <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hang on- the Sappers perform the Rescue function!
>
> ... as per _Greg's_ take on the function, in Freelance Traveller,
> September/October 2019
> (https://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/rules/chargen/sappers.html)
> and July/August 2020
> (https://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/rules/chargen/sappers2.html)
>
>
>> -30-
>> Caires sends via iPhone
>>
>>>> On Aug 9, 2020, at 5:38 PM, Jeff Zeitlin <xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ?I should note that the March/April 2020 issue of Freelance Traveller had
>>> Benedikt Schwarz's take on SAR. You can read the article in the PDF for
>>> that issue, or at
>>> https://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/preproom/starport/03sar.html
>>>
>>> I wouldn't object if someone wanted to do a SAR career for Traveller (any
>>> version), or work up some rules for actually conducting SAR operations as
>>> [part of] an adventure...
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:24:47 -0400, Thomas Jones-Low <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   I've just been spending a fair amount of time reading through GT:Starports in
>>>> pursuit of updating the wiki articles on starports (and connected articles).
>>>>
>>>>   Also, there was/is an ongoing campaign with the Imperial Scout Rescue service,
>>>> which may provide ideas and background.
>>>> 1) http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=40189
>>>> 2) http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=40406
>>>> 3) http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=41149
>>>>
>>>>   Based upon my reading of GT:Starports, the Imperium generally, and the Starport
>>>> Authority specifically, is tasked only with running the port. Which pushes the
>>>> idea of a system coast guard service onto the system government itself. Services
>>>> are paid for by local taxes as the system government has no ability to raise
>>>> money from the ships conducting trade by Imperial decree.
>>>>
>>>>   Officially.
>>>>
>>>>   What is more likely is the local SPA director has several of your really neat
>>>> designs available to perform specific SAR operations, and do some level of
>>>> customs work.
>>>>
>>>>   The Imperium allows worlds to build a local naval force. But given the Imperial
>>>> Navy outclasses almost anything a local system could build and maintain, and
>>>> most worlds are far enough from the border that the Imperial Navy should protect
>>>> them, raising a system guard naval force may sound like a really good idea.
>>>> Especially if there are colonies or stations on other worlds in the same system.
>>>>
>>>>   The SPA can't charge post-fact charges for services rendered, but the world
>>>> government could.
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/9/2020 3:50 PM, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The discussion of the Coast Guards in various places and particularly of the
>>>>> USCG has led me to wonder what typical system wide rescue and system LE/security
>>>>> might look like.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would assume that such a thing might start to exist once you'd been spacing
>>>>> for a while and could get out to the various planets and belts and so on with
>>>>> some ease enough to see some populations out there regularly and on a
>>>>> sustainable basis.
>>>>>
>>>>> So such an entity might start to be relevant around TL-9, but TL-10 would likely
>>>>> be where it started to be more robust and be justified in the economy and in
>>>>> security terms.
>>>>>
>>>>> SG-SR would have several broad mandates:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Law enforcement of system-wide laws. In Imperial space, they could be in
>>>>>   addition to Imperial enforcement, work in conjunction with Imperial
>>>>>   enforcement, or they could even largely shoulder the burden to allow
>>>>>   Imperial assets (other than some inspectors/monitors) to be allocated
>>>>>   elsewhere. Local naval elements could assist SG-SR, be an parallel structure
>>>>>   in terms of this mandate, or direct SG-SR depending on agencies and their
>>>>>   heirarchies. In some particularly peaceful regions, some planets may not
>>>>>   even retain a system navy but instead have an SG-SR. There would be
>>>>>   integration/cooperation generally with local and Imperial law enforcement
>>>>>   around ports-of-entry, stations, and such like.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Providing security within the system - investigating crimes beyond the
>>>>>   mainworlds, pursuing and/or deterring piracy or barratry, securing stations,
>>>>>   high ports, and other sensitive system or Imperial assets (details would
>>>>>   vary depending on relationship of planet and Imperial government likely via
>>>>>   the charter that brought the planet into the Imperium). This also would
>>>>>   include security inspections of vessels, checks on the bona fides and
>>>>>   qualifications of ships and their crews, enforcement of safety and traffic
>>>>>   laws at times, and setting up temporary or permanent exclusion zones (to
>>>>>   avoid a danger for one reason, others exist) and for deploying aides to
>>>>>   navigation as necessary and maintaining them.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Conducting Intelligence work that falls within the mandate of protecting
>>>>>   ports, shipping, and so on related to system travel and commerce.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Search and rescue everywhere but on mainworlds - space search and rescue,
>>>>>   search and rescue on moons, small colonies, space habitats/stations, etc.
>>>>>   throughout the system.
>>>>>
>>>>> * In times of conflict, SG-SR vessels and personnel could be seconded to
>>>>>   either the system navy or the Imperial Navy.
>>>>>
>>>>> * May be seconded to assist in system-related science (schlepping boffins and
>>>>>   gear around, helping get the boffins near stellar or planetary environments
>>>>>   without losing them, etc). This could include some periodic system surveys
>>>>>   for any changes in the worlds/objects in the system and/or concerns that may
>>>>>   require warnings to be posted.
>>>>>
>>>>> What sorts of space-going assets would be involved:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Small fast response vessels - 500 tons or less - with a J-2 capacity
>>>>>   primarily used for fast in-system deployment and evacuation of injured to
>>>>>   stations/worlds/etc. that have better and more advanced medical options, and
>>>>>   with a thrust of 3gs or more (once wounded are embarked, no more than 0.75
>>>>>   or so perceivable gravities would be applied). Likely bearing a turret or
>>>>>   two to deter some threats, but mostly focused on medical response. High
>>>>>   quality sensors and computers would be used to do fast, accurate searches.
>>>>>   There would be one or more modular cutters with casualty evacuation
>>>>>   configurations available. Would have a loaded rack of dropable traffic
>>>>>   beacons and/or sensor platforms to increase search capacity.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Medium sized response vessels - Small hospital ship - a J-2 capacity vessel
>>>>>   with thrust of at J-3 (again limited with wounded embarked) and that would
>>>>>   include one or more surgical blocks (ORs, decontam, isolation, ICU and
>>>>>   standard beds, autodocs, nurses, parameds, doctors). A few turrets just for
>>>>>   basic deterrence, a situation room/fleet command capacity so good comms,
>>>>>   decent to high end sensors to help in searches and coordination of larger
>>>>>   responses. Also would have the ability to drop traffic beacons and sensor
>>>>>   platforms. Includes multiple offloading mechanisms (cutters, straight
>>>>>   docking, close-in assisted line crossings, etc). Would respond to more major
>>>>>   incidents or help to coordinate many smaller vessels for a search of a lot
>>>>>   of space/ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Fast Pursuit Vessels - 500 tons or less. Thrust 6 Gees, Jump 2 for similar
>>>>>   reasons as above, full complement of weapons, high end sensors for pursuing
>>>>>   and tracking vessels and other spacial objects that are of concern related
>>>>>   to security or law enforcement concerns. Includes SG boarding parties who
>>>>>   are specialists in ship boarding and inspection for security reasons.
>>>>>   Includes at least one armed auxilliary able to deploy up to 16 boarders (two
>>>>>   teams). These vessels would be able to help in a search with their sensors
>>>>>   and could help with the security / traffic management during a large
>>>>>   disaster, but would have a primary role in going after fugitives and
>>>>>   inspecting vessels flagged as a potential threat to security.
>>>>>
>>>>> * System Tugs - J-2 wth capacity to bring back other ships on the return leg.
>>>>>   May be over 1000 tons. May be smaller ones that can provide a real-space
>>>>>   tow. Their job is to help get damaged or hazardous vessels or objects moved
>>>>>   to safer places for rescue/repair/disposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Tender - 400 to 600 tons - for deploying and maintaining (including annual
>>>>>   PMs) navigation aides, system sensor buoys, search platforms, science
>>>>>   platforms, and sometimes recovering or fixing in situ smaller SG-SR vessels
>>>>>   that have experienced serious problems that preclude them jumping of
>>>>>   thrusting to a repair destination.
>>>>>
>>>>> Funding would have a component derived from all corporations operating in or
>>>>> passing through the system (a fee charged to ships or enterprises in the system
>>>>> or passing through), some portion of mainworld and corporate businesses in the
>>>>> system (because it is a public service), and perhaps in some places, they may
>>>>> require payments after the fact for their services to help sustain operations.
>>>>>
>>>>> THoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ?The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law.? ?
>>>>> Aristotle
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> The Traveller Mailing List
>>>>> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>>>>> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
>>>>> http://archives.simplelists.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of
>>> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
>>> the trademark in this notice and in the
>>> referenced materials is not intended to
>>> infringe or devalue the trademark.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
>>> Freelance Traveller
>>>   The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
>>> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
>>> http://www.freelancetraveller.com
>>>
>>> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
>>> enterprises for hosting services:
>>>
>>> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
>>> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)
>>> -----
>>> The Traveller Mailing List
>>> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>>> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
>>> http://archives.simplelists.com
>> -----
>> The Traveller Mailing List
>> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
>> http://archives.simplelists.com
>
> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of
> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
> the trademark in this notice and in the
> referenced materials is not intended to
> infringe or devalue the trademark.
>
> --
> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
> Freelance Traveller
>    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
> http://www.freelancetraveller.com
>
> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
> enterprises for hosting services:
>
> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=ExalWfORWmBH2Q7YnA2XrP7LLYoHz0mO