[TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(06 May 2020 14:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Cian Witherspoon
(06 May 2020 15:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Thomas RUX
(06 May 2020 15:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(06 May 2020 15:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets Christopher Sean Hilton (06 May 2020 20:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
James Davies
(06 May 2020 21:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(06 May 2020 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Ethan McKinney
(06 May 2020 22:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Rupert Boleyn
(07 May 2020 00:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Phil Pugliese
(07 May 2020 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Ethan McKinney
(08 May 2020 18:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Phil Pugliese
(08 May 2020 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(08 May 2020 20:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(08 May 2020 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Rupert Boleyn
(08 May 2020 23:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(09 May 2020 02:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(09 May 2020 15:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(09 May 2020 22:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Jeffrey Schwartz
(12 May 2020 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(06 May 2020 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(09 May 2020 21:59 UTC)
|
Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
shadow@xxxxxx
(10 May 2020 23:44 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
Richard Aiken
(11 May 2020 00:02 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 May 2020 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
Richard Aiken
(12 May 2020 01:16 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 04:58 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
shadow@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 20:53 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
Richard Aiken
(13 May 2020 04:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
James Davies
(08 May 2020 21:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(08 May 2020 21:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
James Davies
(08 May 2020 22:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(08 May 2020 23:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(09 May 2020 02:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Christopher Sean Hilton
(12 May 2020 17:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(12 May 2020 17:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Ethan McKinney
(12 May 2020 18:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(12 May 2020 18:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(14 May 2020 03:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(13 May 2020 19:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 18:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 18:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(13 May 2020 19:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(08 May 2020 22:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(09 May 2020 22:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(09 May 2020 22:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(09 May 2020 22:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(09 May 2020 22:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(09 May 2020 23:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Vareck Bostrom
(09 May 2020 23:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(10 May 2020 00:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(10 May 2020 21:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(10 May 2020 23:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Phil Pugliese
(11 May 2020 03:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(11 May 2020 03:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 May 2020 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(12 May 2020 01:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 05:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 05:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(09 May 2020 23:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(09 May 2020 23:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(10 May 2020 23:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(10 May 2020 23:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(10 May 2020 23:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
Richard Aiken
(10 May 2020 23:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 May 2020 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
shadow@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 20:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(13 May 2020 15:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(11 May 2020 17:56 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
Graham Donald
(12 May 2020 06:07 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(12 May 2020 14:43 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
Graham Donald
(13 May 2020 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: Nuclear excavation (Re: [TML] Lifting off from planets)
shadow@xxxxxx
(13 May 2020 19:07 UTC)
|
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:47:34AM -0700, Vareck Bostrom wrote: > > ============================================================ > > T5 states: > If a ship has a drive capable of acceleration in Gs greater than world surface > gravity, it may land or leave using that drive. Wings may increase drive > acceleration. > > If a ship does not have a drive capable of Gs greater than world surface gravity, > it must instead use Safe Boost or Safe Reentry. > > Safe Boost and Safe Reentry in turn for time to orbit of 5 hours x world size. The > logic behind this isn't further explained that I see. > > [ ..snip.. ] I'm not sure what T5's Safe Boost and Safe Reentry are but I'll search for them in the rules later. There are lots of ways to solve this problem and it's generally much easier than you would think. The solutions depend largely on how maneuver drives work. Note well that this hasn't been explained well in any version of Traveller so far as I can see. Solutions --------- 1. Contra Grav If you assume that maneuver drives are contra grav then a 1G ship can effectively negate it's weight in a 1G gravity field and a strong man or a small attitude thruster could push it to a height where it could use it's drive to achieve orbital velocity. So, Contra Grave engines basically handwave the problem away. 2. No Contra Grav However much handwavium you need to apply to get maneuver drives to work in these universes, at the end of the day, I think that logic dictates that a 1G ship cannot take off in a 1G field here via a tail-stand. But taking off in a tail-stand isn't required for a 1G ship to achieve orbit from the surface of a 1G planet. Imagine a vacuum world with 1G, surface gravity, and a friction-less train car running on a track that ran around the entire equator. If G is 10 m/s**2 rather than Earth's 9.8 m/s**2 then the spacecraft/train-car combo is "in orbit" at a speed of just over 8km/s because at the velocity tangential to the surface of the world the effective G is 0 m/s**2. The spacecraft/train-car can achieve that speed in about 13 minutes or 1.3 Book 2 space travel turns. In 1 Book 2 turn the same ship would: * be moving at 6 km/s; * have traversed 1800 km; * experience .441 G or 4.41 m/s**2 pull towards the center of the planet. The point here is that after 1 CT:Book 2 space travel turn thrusting laterally in a 1G field, a 1G ship could now leisurely achieve orbital height and velocity. For ships in a more realistic universe where 1G worlds have atmospheres and we don't have handwavium levitated train cars we need help, not much help but a bit of help. a. Booster rockets/vehicle The ship could get a ride into space on or in some vehicle that can "tail-stand to orbit" b. Air carried launch systems A vehicle using wings to generate lift or even a very large airship generating lift via buoyancy could carry the spaceship to an altitude where the atmosphere is much thinner (30km or more on Earth). From there the ships motors can push the ship into orbit. Note that this is a balancing act where the ship is going to trade some of that altitude for time creating orbital velocity. e.g. the ship will be thrusting somewhat laterally and somewhat anti-radially to avoid crashing. c. Over-boost Engines and motors in Traveller don't operate anywhere near like their *real world* analogs. In the real world, engines can usually be "over-driven" for short periods of time with minimal damage outside of slightly increased wear. In the same way, a 1G drive in a free trader can be pushed to produce 1.1, maybe 1.2 G briefly. Under those circumstances, a 1G free trader could achieve orbit of a 1G world by using a few handfuls of turns of over-boost. The cost to the ship would probably be that the annual overhaul would be that much sooner. -- -- Chris __o "All I was trying to do was get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)_____________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com]