Cool new Traveller tech in production Grimmund (08 May 2014 18:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Kurt Feltenberger (08 May 2014 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (08 May 2014 20:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 21:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Ian Whitchurch (08 May 2014 21:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (08 May 2014 22:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 23:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (09 May 2014 13:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (09 May 2014 20:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production W. Hopper (10 May 2014 16:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (10 May 2014 21:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (09 May 2014 10:28 UTC)

Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese 08 May 2014 22:34 UTC

It strikes me that this sort of gadget would be SOP for BattleSuit/CombatArmor equipped personnel with F/PGMP's.
I would expect that the 'cord' option would be in effect as the miniatures usually show the troops carrying the weapons.
Heck BattleDress even has the weapon sorta' 'built-in'.

Of course, for certain 'ambush' scenarios I suppose weapons could be used similarly to the way claymores are deployed, only w/ a lot better situatonal awareness. I would still prefer a cord option. Well-shielded of course.

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5/8/14, Ian Whitchurch <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Date: Thursday, May 8, 2014, 2:59 PM

 Broadcasting your position is bad for your health,
 as is being too far from your personal weapon.
 Me, I suggest using a
 cord.
 Note Hizbollah,
 despite a general 1-2 tech level disadvantage, did good work
 tracking emissions from various Israeli military units
 during the last Lebannon war.

 On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:33
 AM, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@pharmacy.arizona.edu>
 wrote:

 On May 8, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Jeffrey Schwartz <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:

 >> This will be nice to put money in people's
 pockets and push the tech

 >> forward, but I can't see wireless devices like
 this being viable on the

 >> battlefield...unless you're hunting Haji and
 even then he's becoming much

 >> more advanced.  All you need is a good jammer to
 disrupt the signal and the

 >> device loses it's benefit.

 >>

 >

 > Or, more fun, a _detector_

 >

 > Hooked to an alarm, so you know they're coming.

 >

 > Or hooked to an IED, which would also have a
 distinctive alert sound effect.

 Or simply hacked to falsify the feed “These are not
 the droids you’re looking for"

 --

 Bruce Johnson

 University of Arizona

 College of Pharmacy

 Information Technology Group

 Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs

 -----

 The Traveller Mailing List

 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml

 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com

 To unsubscribe from this list please goto

 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=Qjs81DnfPhuRQ7Rw3I0XVltos3d36yjy

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=I9z88Ce30rmDm2wPhGgq7nrV9FDAMKl5