Compassion Corps Symbols
Jeff Zeitlin
(10 Dec 2019 23:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Kenneth Barns
(12 Dec 2019 00:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Jeff Zeitlin
(15 Dec 2019 21:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Richard Aiken
(12 Dec 2019 05:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Phil Pugliese
(12 Dec 2019 06:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Bruce Johnson
(12 Dec 2019 23:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Phil Pugliese
(13 Dec 2019 05:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Jeff Zeitlin
(15 Dec 2019 21:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Jeff Zeitlin
(15 Dec 2019 21:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Kenneth Barns
(16 Dec 2019 07:44 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Brett Kruger
(16 Dec 2019 07:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Kenneth Barns
(16 Dec 2019 09:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols Jeff Zeitlin (17 Dec 2019 00:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
Kenneth Barns
(17 Dec 2019 03:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(20 Dec 2019 02:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Compassion Corps Symbols
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 Dec 2019 04:36 UTC)
|
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:44:15 +1000, Kenneth Barns <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 07:56, Jeff Zeitlin <xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> >wrote: > >> >> A justifiable attitude, and quite parallel to the development of the 'third >> protocol' that defines the Red Crystal - but consider, as I suggested in my >> reply to Ken, that it was Sylea, not Vland or Terra, that was the center of >> the nascent Third Imperium (and thus not unlikely to impose their own >> symbology, just as a fast answer to "we need some sort of consistent >> symbology for this"). > > >I think symbology, once established, is likely to be _highly_ conserved > Consider: >* the various astrological/alchemical symbols are still used as short-hand > on astronomical charts; >* religious/political symbols (the cross in all its variations, the Roman > eagle, yin-yang); >* mathematical functions; and even >* musical notation. > >(For simplicity, from this point forward, I will use the term 'the "Red" >Cross' to refer to the shape of the Red Cross - with arms of equal length >to their width - without any reference to the colour. I think the _shape_, >which is not legally protected in the way the red-on-white or white-on-red >versions of that shape are protected, is a universally recognised symbol, >and is likely to be for a long, long time.) Actually, that particular shape is generally called the 'Swiss' cross when it's not used in a IFRCS/ICRC contexts, and especially when it's not red-on-white. This is because the RC took it from the Swiss flag. The shape alone is specifically not protected; that's why (for example) video games can use green crosses on the "heal" packages. Both Tonga and Johnson+Johnson were 'grandfathered' in as their usages predated the establishment of the RC as a protective symbol; even so, Tonga switched their national flag from being simply the red cross on white to a red flag with a white canton with the red cross on the canton. And, fundamentally, I don't disagree with the RC (cross or crystal) 'sticking around' (although 3000 years is stretching the suspenders a bit); I just need to avoid it for all of the modern mundane legal reasons. >In as much as new symbology is developed, it is to meet the needs of new >universal concepts arising (reload, on/off, home, save ... just looking >around my computer screen). I have having a hard time thinking of examples >where a widely recognised symbol for a concept which continued to be >important was replaced by another "new" symbol. A case in point is the >stubborn persistence of the 3.5" floppy as the save icon (despite many >attempts to replace it with more generic symbols), and the old rotary-dial >handset (or whole phone) to represent the phone function ... and these >_clearly_ outdated icons do not have the weight of generations of use >behind them! And yet, the 3.5 floppy quickly replaced the 5.25/8" floppy that was used before it, and that itself replaced the reel tape. Power went from separate 1 and 0 to a combined symbol. The Red Crystal itself is only 15 years old. Symbology stability is clearly something of a mixed bag. >Against that high degree of conservation, I see the Rule of Man starting >out using well-established Terran standard icons. (And I think, your >current concerns aside Jeff, this would almost certainly include the Red - >or colourblind - Cross.) Within a century or two, there would be a >"survival of the fittest" between the Terran icons and their Vilani >equivalents - probably with the simplest (or most unambiguous - just >imagine the "Red" Cross being the Vilani universal symbol for toilet >facilities) winning. Again, I don't disagree; I simply need to avoid setting myself up for possible legal trouble. >By the time of Twilight some 3-400 years later, there would be a new >universal standard for icons throughout the Imperium. This standard would >be the standard used by the Sylean Protectorate and all its successor >states through until the Third Imperium. At its nadir, the Sylea continued >to control 4 subsectors (GURPS Humaniti). I cannot see any cultural crises >during that nadir which trigger a wholesale replacement of the fused >Vilani/Terran symbology for a newly developed "Sylean" iconography. > >I DO like your integration of the red crystal, the ankh, and the "Red" >Cross. Perhaps even throw in the upward "T" and you have the fusion symbol >that might come out of Vilani and Terran ambiguities. Imagine an >upside-down 5-pointed asterisk (https://tinyurl.com/robz44u) >with the upper two arms coming together to make a "Red" Crystal. > >So, looking for a backstory ... > >Early leaders of the Rule of Man see the Vilani "upward T" (looking like >the image I sent, but with a longer stem) and think - "Hmm, looks too much >like an up arrow to most Terrans. They see the Terran-official Red Cross >and think - "Nope, that's the Vilani toilet symbol ... and besides, we need >something that is colour independent." > >A graphic designer comes up with the "outreaching ankh" (as described >above). To Vilani, it can be sold as better than the Red Cross as it >incorporates the Vilani "upward-T". Across Terran-dominated space, the Red >Cross and Crescent are gradually replaced with the Red Crystal on the >various international and national organisations that use those icons, and >the Crystal (heedless of colour) occupies the same place in our shared >iconography that the "Red" Cross does today. When Terrans see the >"outreaching ankh" they notice the Crystal at its head; more >literary-minded Terrans might also recognise the ankh-symbol too. Both the >Crystal and the ankh identify the "outreaching ankh" as the universal >symbol for health care. Even many minor races might see the symbol as a >generic upright sophont, and get achieve buy-in that way. The idea I had, after the "upward T" was floated, can be found at https://www.freelancetraveller.com/images/red-ankh.png >As a completely different option - how about a simplified immunoglobulin >monomer structure, the 4-part "Y"? >http://www.biology.arizona.edu/immunology/tutorials/antibody/structure.html An interesting shape; perhaps a symbol for specifically pharmacology/ pharmacy, the way the Star of Life is for emergency medicine? ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)