Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Nov 2019 23:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Thomas Jones-Low
(25 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 21:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 07:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 01:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Kurt Feltenberger
(26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Kelly St. Clair
(26 Nov 2019 02:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 15:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Bruce Johnson
(26 Nov 2019 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Cian Witherspoon
(26 Nov 2019 16:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:37 UTC)
|
Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 13:50 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:18 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:33 UTC)
|
Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 16:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 02:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 03:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(02 Dec 2019 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Jeffrey Schwartz
(09 Dec 2019 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(09 Dec 2019 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 14:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 15:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC)
|
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:12:02 -0500, Jeffrey Schwartz <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote to Freelance Traveller: >Are you suggesting an IMTU Retcon on cutter module shape? >If so, yeah, makes perfect sense, I endorse it. >Makes a lot of the published ship designs not work, though, since the >space allocated for spare cutter modules needs to expand. > >The square makes a lot of sense, and someone else said "LASH" and it >also makes sense for container stacking shore-side. Not so much a retcon as an optional alternative, e.g., for quick "construction" groundside, or for LASH. >I have a suggestion: >In looking at the definition of "cutter", it looks like "Sloop" is the >next step up. >I'd propose the design of a new small craft class : 80 ton Sloop. >It uses a 6x6x15m module, has a 6x6m cross section on the nose (8m >long streamlined that has the same volume as 6x6x7) and tail (6x6x8 >box) portions. >One feature of the Sloop class is the fold-down anchor arms on the >inside of the pod-bay that allow it to latch a 30 ton cylinder module >in place for reverse compatibility. Write it up for the Shipyard! >On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:36 PM Jeff Zeitlin ><xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> wrote: >> >> The standard cutter module is a cylinder, given as 15m long and 6m >> diameter, for a displacement of 30dT. However, because of the shape, less >> than the full 30dT is usable. >> >> What are the ramifications of building a module with cutter-compatible >> fittings, but square in cross-section, 6m wide, 6m high, and 15m long, for >> a total (and usable) volume of 40dT? >> >> >> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of >> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of >> the trademark in this notice and in the >> referenced materials is not intended to >> infringe or devalue the trademark. >> >> -- >> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor >> Freelance Traveller >> The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource >> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com >> http://www.freelancetraveller.com >> >> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following >> enterprises for hosting services: >> >> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) >> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com) >> ----- >> The Traveller Mailing List >> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml >> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com >> To unsubscribe from this list please go to >> http://archives.simplelists.com >----- >The Traveller Mailing List >Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml >Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com >To unsubscribe from this list please go to >http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=uVyfonVzlsGwnSKN2tn21umMrgO3BRd9 ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)