Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Nov 2019 23:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Thomas Jones-Low
(25 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 21:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 07:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 01:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Kurt Feltenberger
(26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Kelly St. Clair
(26 Nov 2019 02:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 15:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Bruce Johnson
(26 Nov 2019 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Cian Witherspoon
(26 Nov 2019 16:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:37 UTC)
|
Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 13:50 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:18 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:33 UTC)
|
Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 16:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 02:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 03:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(02 Dec 2019 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Jeffrey Schwartz
(09 Dec 2019 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(09 Dec 2019 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 14:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 15:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC)
|
This isn't intended as a replacement for the standard module in _all_ applications; those two (merc and lab), for example, where the storage/docking spaces are specifically "cut" for the cylindrical module, would still have their various assorted cylindersavailable. But for e.g., your LASH ops idea, or perhaps the Ministry of Colonization, or perhaps some of the megacorporate shipping ops, might want the squared-off 40dT modules for more efficient space utilization or stacking/constructing. On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:47:36 -0500, Thomas Jones-Low <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >There are some fitting that assume the round module. The merc cruiser comes >to mind immediately. And the lab ship as well. > >I can see for LASH operations , the square module would make more sense > >On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:36 PM Jeff Zeitlin <xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> >wrote: > >> The standard cutter module is a cylinder, given as 15m long and 6m >> diameter, for a displacement of 30dT. However, because of the shape, less >> than the full 30dT is usable. >> >> What are the ramifications of building a module with cutter-compatible >> fittings, but square in cross-section, 6m wide, 6m high, and 15m long, for >> a total (and usable) volume of 40dT? >> >> >> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of >> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of >> the trademark in this notice and in the >> referenced materials is not intended to >> infringe or devalue the trademark. >> >> -- >> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor >> Freelance Traveller >> The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource >> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com >> http://www.freelancetraveller.com >> >> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following >> enterprises for hosting services: >> >> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) >> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com) >> ----- >> The Traveller Mailing List >> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml >> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com >> To unsubscribe from this list please go to >> http://archives.simplelists.com ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)