Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(25 Nov 2019 23:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Thomas Jones-Low
(25 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 21:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 07:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 01:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kurt Feltenberger (26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Kelly St. Clair
(26 Nov 2019 02:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 15:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Bruce Johnson
(26 Nov 2019 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Cian Witherspoon
(26 Nov 2019 16:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Ethan McKinney
(26 Nov 2019 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 12:37 UTC)
|
Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 13:50 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:18 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Rupert Boleyn
(27 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Cian Witherspoon
(27 Nov 2019 14:33 UTC)
|
Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 16:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 02:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Ethan McKinney
(28 Nov 2019 03:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Phil Pugliese
(28 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(02 Dec 2019 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Jeffrey Schwartz
(09 Dec 2019 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Drop tanks
Thomas RUX
(09 Dec 2019 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q)
Thomas RUX
(27 Nov 2019 14:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Nov 2019 15:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeffrey Schwartz
(26 Nov 2019 15:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q
Jeff Zeitlin
(26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC)
|
On 11/25/2019 6:35 PM, Jeff Zeitlin wrote: > The standard cutter module is a cylinder, given as 15m long and 6m > diameter, for a displacement of 30dT. However, because of the shape, less > than the full 30dT is usable. > > What are the ramifications of building a module with cutter-compatible > fittings, but square in cross-section, 6m wide, 6m high, and 15m long, for > a total (and usable) volume of 40dT? One thing that I thought was sort of implied with the standard small craft is that they were considered "Industry Standard" in that a "cutter" made by company A will fit all the fixtures and modules of a "cutter" made by companies B, C, D, E, F, etc. If you deviate from the dimensions, while it may still be a "cutter" in job or capabilities, it is no longer considered standard. -- Kurt Feltenberger xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com “Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me