Dear Folks –

Joshua kindly replied:
>Yes, using ? in UWPs and PBGs for unknown stats is supported. If
size/atm/hyd are ??? you'll get the * glyph.

I’m obviously doing something wrong. I’ve entered three versions (to see if
any of the combinations worked; the first line is to show that the “normal”
entry passes with a warning):

B0102      0902 X7B4000-0        Tp               011 Na
B0109      0909 X???000-0                        ???
B0109      0909 X???000-0
B0109      0909 X??????-?                        ???

And get the following:

Hint: Parsing as: SEC (Legacy)
Warning: Missing code: Fl, line 1: B0102      0902 X7B4000-0        Tp
011 Na
Warning: Missing code: Ba, line 1: B0102      0902 X7B4000-0        Tp
011 Na
Error: SEC Parse, line 2: B0109      0909 X???000-0
???
Error: SEC Parse, line 3: B0109      0909 X???000-0

Error: SEC Parse, line 4: B0109      0909 X??????-?
???
3 errors, 2 warnings.

Can you tell me what I’m doing wrong?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
David "Hyphen" Jaques-Watson ..at.. Beowulf Down (Tavonni/Vilis/SM 1520)
http://www.tip.net.au/~davidjw                    xxxxxx@pcug.org.au
"I file things in historical order, with a hashing algorithm of gravity"