On the testing bandwagon... Joseph Paul (30 Apr 2014 15:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Peter Berghold (30 Apr 2014 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Joseph Paul (30 Apr 2014 17:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Greg Nokes (30 Apr 2014 18:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (01 May 2014 06:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Eris Reddoch (01 May 2014 21:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Freelance Traveller (01 May 2014 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Andrew Long (01 May 2014 23:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Bruce Johnson (01 May 2014 23:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (02 May 2014 19:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (02 May 2014 19:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (02 May 2014 21:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Ros Knox & Michael Barry (03 May 2014 08:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (04 May 2014 10:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (04 May 2014 15:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (04 May 2014 17:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (04 May 2014 18:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (03 May 2014 10:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 21:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Bruce Johnson (01 May 2014 23:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (02 May 2014 01:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Tim (02 May 2014 06:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 10:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (02 May 2014 12:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (02 May 2014 19:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (03 May 2014 06:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Ros Knox & Michael Barry (03 May 2014 07:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (03 May 2014 15:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (03 May 2014 16:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (03 May 2014 16:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (04 May 2014 04:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Richard Aiken (04 May 2014 06:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Richard Aiken (02 May 2014 06:22 UTC)

Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Freelance Traveller 01 May 2014 22:51 UTC

On Thu, 01 May 2014 16:01:02 -0500, Eris Reddoch <erisred@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

>Ob Trav:  Imagine the trouble when a system joins the Imperium
>and has to switch all their communications and calendar to
>Imperial standards. Maybe that's one reason the Vilani are so
>conservative when it comes to change? :)

Actually, I don't know that it would be any sort of major problem: the
world would have to make changes only for their dealing directly with
the Imperium; local-only stuff could - and probably would - remain with
their local protocols.

Even today, some countries - Israel and China are two that immediately
spring to mind; a few second's reflection says to add most of the Moslem
world to the list - use two calendars in parallel, the Gregorian and a
local one, the latter generally being used for traditional or religious
purposes.

Where the local astronomical year doesn't match up with the Imperial
year, a local calendar may be considered more important than the
Imperial one, as agricultural rhythms will conform to the local seasonal
cycles. Local timekeeping may persist, too, as a better fit than the
Standard Imperial Clock - for example, rather than adding a 37-odd
minute "comp" to the day if I were on a resource-independent Mars, I'd
simply make my seconds about three percent longer, so that the Martian
day would be 24 *hours of 60 *minutes of 60 *seconds, so that everything
comes out nice and even, and time-zone corrections don't have to worry
about "are they six hours ahead or are they in Comp right now, or ...".
For communication with Earth, I'd have access to clocks and calendars
that keep Earth time, but it doesn't otherwise make sense for Mars to
conform to an Earth clock or Earth calendar - it simply doesn't fit the
astronomical facts of Mars.

Even for some Imperial commerce, an Imperial noble acting as nominal
Imperial Governor of my world might be willing to accept that the world
will conduct business affairs on the local calendar; if s/he has
sufficient liquidity, and my local year is 401 Standard Imperial days,
s/he might accept receiving taxes once per _local_ year, if s/he
receives the extra 10% that represents the difference in the length of a
year. Or, if my year is only 244 Standard Imperial Days, s/he might
accept one remit per local year, again, but one of only 67% of the
Standard Imperial Annual Tab. Or, s/he might insist that we remit on the
Imperium's schedule, to placate the Office of Calendar Compliance.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported
    Traveller® Fanzine and Resource

editor@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com
http://freelancetraveller.downport.com/

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2014. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

CyberNET Web Hosting (http://www.cyberwebhosting.net)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)