Emerging megacorp war
Bruce Johnson
(26 Apr 2014 01:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
John Geoffrey
(26 Apr 2014 08:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Knapp
(26 Apr 2014 10:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Kurt Feltenberger
(26 Apr 2014 15:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Knapp
(26 Apr 2014 16:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
John Geoffrey
(26 Apr 2014 21:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war Tim (27 Apr 2014 02:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Ian Whitchurch
(27 Apr 2014 03:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Ian Wood
(27 Apr 2014 08:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Tim
(27 Apr 2014 08:54 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Antony Farrell
(27 Apr 2014 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Emerging megacorp war
Richard Aiken
(29 Apr 2014 05:26 UTC)
|
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:52:09PM +0200, John Geoffrey wrote: > On 26/04/14 18:14, Knapp wrote: > > I found it very interesting that the very top was Walmart selling > > everyday stuff but then look just how often oil is on the list!!! What > > would the Traveller equivalent of oil be? I don't think there will necessarily be any such trade good. That is, something that is destroyed by use, obtained primarily from a few major areas, and used by a large fraction of the planet's population every day. To be an equivalent it would also need to be expensive enough to constitute a sizeable fraction of the economy while also cheap enough that substitution by other goods isn't worthwhile. I think the closest equivalent would likely be foodstuffs. Some systems will be very much more suited to producing them than others, by a margin that would probably cover the cost of transport. > Lanthanum maybe? Access to it could govern if a planet can actually > build jumpships according to their TL. Other metals also might > figure in here. Some systems will definitely be richer in many metals than most others, and nucleosynthesis will be expensive even with Traveller technology. So yes, metals of various sorts would certainly be major interstellar trade goods. Such goods are not really an oil equivalent, though. The volume of use per capita will be comparatively small, and they aren't destroyed by use. > Oil itself might still be important for non-fuel applications (e.g. > meds, plastics), and with so many planets that created carbon-based > life this might still be an interesting trade good. I expect that in a cheap space setting like Traveller, almost all the hydrocarbons would be of non-biological origin. Carbon is one of the most common element in the universe, and most compounds of it in nature are with hydrogen. For example, the hydrocarbons in Jupiter's atmosphere mass more than all of the rocky planets and moons of the solar system put together. Other cold bodies have hydrocarbons on their surfaces in various quantities. So I don't think that's as likely to be an interstellar trade good. It's probably too common in every system to be worth transporting routinely through Jump in large quantities. That said, it might be worth carrying aboard starships as part of a hydrogen fuel reserve. Like some other hydrogen compounds, it holds more hydrogen per unit volume than liquid hydrogen does while being easier to store. - Tim