Pseudo-administrative request...
Jeff Zeitlin
(13 Jul 2019 17:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Peter Vernon
(13 Jul 2019 19:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Vareck Bostrom
(13 Jul 2019 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Thomas RUX
(13 Jul 2019 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request... Jeff Zeitlin (13 Jul 2019 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Christopher Hilton
(14 Jul 2019 15:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Vareck Bostrom
(14 Jul 2019 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Christopher Hilton
(14 Jul 2019 16:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Pseudo-administrative request...
Evyn MacDude
(14 Jul 2019 19:06 UTC)
|
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:25:38 -0700 (PDT), Thomas RUX <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote: >I have to disagree you can leave out quoting part of the thread. There have >been a number of topics that I've tried to follow and reply to but did not >have any idea of what the original topic was. Wading through the thread was >not much help either. If that happens, it means that the trimming of quotes has been excessive, not judicious - and yes, for some people, it might be easy to go from one to the other. What 'judicious' means _needs_ to be person-dependent. If "Billy-joe-bob" is using a client that breaks or omits the "references" and "in-reply-to" headers, or ignores them on incoming mail, he needs to trim _less_, because he's going to be breaking threads and/or dealing with broken threads left and right. There are a couple of people on the list that are in this boat, and some webmail providers (especially one that used to be hot, and now offers an enterprise mail service with a number as part of its name) are particularly evil about this. Similarly if one is replying to the digest - but even then, trim out messages from the digest that you're _not_ replying to. As general rules of thumb, I use "if I'm not replying to that particular point, I'm not quoting that particular point" and "if it's more than three levels of quoting, I probably shouldn't quote it". Often, I don't quote more than two levels - but sometimes the third level is useful. The fourth level rarely is, so you'll always see "> ..." in my replies, often ">> ...", and occasionally ">>> ..." - but never ">>>> ...". And sometimes, if I think that the quoting will be too much even within my rule, I might not quote, but instead summarize within brackets (e.g., "[a good exposition on how not to quote]"). Those rules seem to have worked for me for more years than I'd care to admit to - but they did take time for me to develop, from experience and observation. ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)