Zhodani Psi: Developed from Gnostic Philosophy? Jeff Zeitlin (12 May 2019 01:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Zhodani Psi: Developed from Gnostic Philosophy?
Jeff Zeitlin
(20 May 2019 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Zhodani Psi: Developed from Gnostic Philosophy?
Cian Witherspoon
(21 May 2019 16:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Zhodani Psi: Developed from Gnostic Philosophy?
Jeff Zeitlin
(21 May 2019 22:35 UTC)
|
Summary: The Zhodani development of a form of gnosis led to their acceptance of psi. Explication: If I have understood my reading/research on gnosis and gnosticism properly, it can be viewed as being a concern with the dichotomy between 'world' and 'self'. On Terra, where the environment and the physical body are compatible, the 'self' portion of the dichotomy became concerned with specifically the spiritual aspects of 'self', largely relegating the physical aspects of 'self' to being included with 'world'. On Zhdant, this dichotomy would have developed differently. The environment being more clearly incompatible, the dichotomy between 'self' and 'world' would reasonably have included the physical aspects of 'self' alongside the spiritual. In essence, the physical 'self' represents a manifestation of the spiritual 'self', rather than representing a part of 'world' that 'self' uses as a vessel for a time. This leads to two possible views of death - in the first view, the death of the physical self represents the end of all manifestation of 'self'; the physical 'self' and the spiritual 'self' are inextricably linked, and the state of the physical 'self' always is an accurate manifestation of the state of the spiritual 'self'. This leads to a culture which would mourn death, and which might very well lead to the technologies of mummification and memorialization, as with, for example, the Nile valley culture. In the other view, the death of the physical 'self' represents a new manifestation of the spiritual 'self', one which no longer feels a need to manifest physically, and is hence 'more developed' and more unrestricted. This leads to a culture which would celebrate a death rather than mourn it, and which would likely lead to a dynamic culture willing to push the limits of knowledge, in a quest to develop beyond the need for a physical manifestation. Although my gut feeling says that what follows is more likely with the second culture than with the first culture, it would be possible under both cultures that development of psi powers - specifically those dealing with _self_ (the Awareness group, the Clairvoyance group and teleportation-self) - would be viewed as spiritually favorable, representing a different level of control over the spiritual 'self' and therefore its manifestation of the physical 'self' than most people have. Other social/religious phenomena that might be expected to develop would include those that show tolerance for extremes of conditions or strong control over the physical self - firewalking, living burial, and so on - many of the things that we normally associate with Indian fakirs or other forms of mysticism from that part of the world, whether we believe that they actually happen or not. If, parallel to the development of the Awareness talents, a rudimentary telepathy or telempathy also develops, there are other directions that the (proto-)philosophy/religion can go, while still remaining within the framework of gnostic thought: * The limited detection of thought or emotion might be interpreted as the Presence of Immanence - that is, confirmation of the reality of deity/deities. Those in whom the ability is stronger are perceived as more spiritually developed, and 'closer' to deity, either in the sense of "being in the presence of the god(s)", or "being more like the god(s)", thus encouraging the further development of these talents. * Alternatively, it might be interpreted as remembering incidents or emotions from past lives. In line with the idea that the physical self is a manifestation of the status of the spiritual self, this could lead to the idea of reincarnation as further opportunity for spiritual self-improvement, and one's present station in life being a result of one's spiritual preparation in a previous life (comparable to the ideas of karma and samsara in Indo-Buddhist thought). The further development of these talents could be encouraged, as better knowledge of one's past lives might allow one to make better choices in this one, leading to a better reincarnation in one's next cycle, or perhaps leaving the wheel of karma entirely. In either case, the development of a society where those with stronger psionic talents - thus, more spiritually developed - are considered "more fit" to guide others toward spiritual completeness is not unreasonable. From there, increasing secularization of a society with such an underlying framework might well lead to an organization such as the Tavrchedl' (as described in the Zhodani Alien Module), and the division of society into franchised Nobles (with psionic ability) and disenfranchised Proles (without psionic ability). Comments/discussion? Can anyone flesh this out better? Should they? ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)