Pocket universes? Phil Pugliese (04 Apr 2019 20:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Catherine Berry (04 Apr 2019 20:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Richard Aiken (04 Apr 2019 22:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Bruce Johnson (04 Apr 2019 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Tim (05 Apr 2019 08:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Timothy Collinson (05 Apr 2019 08:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Phil Pugliese (05 Apr 2019 20:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Rupert Boleyn (05 Apr 2019 09:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Tim (05 Apr 2019 12:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Phil Pugliese (05 Apr 2019 20:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Catherine Berry (05 Apr 2019 20:52 UTC)

Re: [TML] Pocket universes? Rupert Boleyn 05 Apr 2019 09:04 UTC

On 05Apr2019 0921, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote:
> After recent discussion about FTL travel, I started thinking about
> G'father's 'pocket universe/s'. (I think if there's one there could
> easily be more, who knows?) Anyway, the one we know of for sure in
> the TU has been in existence 100's of thousands of years, right? So
> the stars/suns contained in it have  pumped out an unbelievably
> enormous amount of energy into a basically 'closed system'. (no
> 'expanding universe' here, AFAIK) So what happened to all that
> energy? Both 'conventional' & TU 'handwavium' speculation welcomed!

Assuming that the 'wrap around' has no refraction in it, the light
leaving a star should arrive back at that star. So to observers on a
planet it would be like there was a dim star just like their primary  in
exactly the opposite direction. For the star itself, aside from the
small amount of energy blocked by planets, rocks, dust, etc., the whole
sky would be glowing with its own light returning.

What it would do to stellar life having almost all the emitted energy
returned to a star, I do not know.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief