J3
Evyn MacDude
(25 Dec 2018 19:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(25 Dec 2018 21:34 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] J3
Frank Filz
(29 Dec 2018 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Evyn MacDude
(31 Dec 2018 02:43 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] J3
Frank Filz
(02 Jan 2019 17:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Ethan McKinney
(02 Jan 2019 19:42 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] J3
Frank Filz
(02 Jan 2019 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Kurt Feltenberger
(03 Jan 2019 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(03 Jan 2019 00:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Evyn MacDude
(04 Jan 2019 00:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Greg Nokes
(04 Jan 2019 01:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Kurt Feltenberger
(04 Jan 2019 02:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Cian Witherspoon
(04 Jan 2019 03:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(04 Jan 2019 04:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(04 Jan 2019 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(04 Jan 2019 04:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(04 Jan 2019 08:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Evyn MacDude
(04 Jan 2019 09:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(04 Jan 2019 22:32 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] J3
Frank Filz
(04 Jan 2019 15:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(05 Jan 2019 06:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(05 Jan 2019 18:21 UTC)
|
Economics [was] J3
Evyn MacDude
(05 Jan 2019 23:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Catherine Berry
(08 Jan 2019 20:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Phil Pugliese
(08 Jan 2019 20:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Catherine Berry
(08 Jan 2019 21:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
evyn.macdude
(08 Jan 2019 23:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Phil Pugliese
(09 Jan 2019 00:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Greg Nokes
(09 Jan 2019 00:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Rupert Boleyn
(09 Jan 2019 00:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Richard Aiken
(09 Jan 2019 04:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
evyn.macdude
(09 Jan 2019 04:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3
Bruce Johnson
(09 Jan 2019 18:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3 Bruce Johnson (06 Jan 2019 18:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(06 Jan 2019 20:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(06 Jan 2019 23:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(04 Jan 2019 03:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Evyn MacDude
(04 Jan 2019 07:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(04 Jan 2019 08:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Rupert Boleyn
(04 Jan 2019 03:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(07 Jan 2019 20:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Jan 2019 21:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(08 Jan 2019 01:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Richard Aiken
(08 Jan 2019 02:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(08 Jan 2019 20:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(08 Jan 2019 21:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(09 Jan 2019 00:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Rupert Boleyn
(09 Jan 2019 01:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Vareck Bostrom
(09 Jan 2019 03:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Richard Aiken
(09 Jan 2019 04:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
shadow@xxxxxx
(18 Jan 2019 07:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 17:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Sudnadja
(09 Jan 2019 18:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 18:34 UTC)
|
Off topic request for info; Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(10 Jan 2019 01:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
shadow@xxxxxx
(18 Jan 2019 07:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(18 Jan 2019 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jan 2019 09:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Tim
(18 Jan 2019 13:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Sudnadja
(09 Jan 2019 18:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 18:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Bruce Johnson
(09 Jan 2019 19:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Catherine Berry
(09 Jan 2019 19:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] J3
Ethan McKinney
(02 Jan 2019 19:46 UTC)
|
Yes, in terms of economics the OTU simply does not make sense, in many ways. If you're restricted to small ships, and interstellar trade is essentially a rounding error as a fraction of total trade, they why is there a need for an Imperium? Where does the money come from to support the gargantuan naval fleet, (plus scout service, marines, and other ancillary branches) the OTU requires? And why? My opinion has always been that PC-level ship operations are running in the backwaters, 'small package' trade and such. fulfilling the 'tramp steamer' kind of traffic. Building the kind of interstellar infrastructure that exists costs several orders of magnitude more that the trade is worth. It's akin to building the modern ports of Rotterdam, or Long Beach...in order to service the equivalent of the cross-indian ocean dhow fleet between the Arabian Gulf and India. ( This episode of 'Michael Palin Around the World in 80 Days' give a great glimpse of that world. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1z37k7 ) Way back in the MT days, Alvin Plummer wrote up a great post about the kinds of ships that the Imperial Navy WAS built to protect. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~bjohnson/Majesta.html I think it neatly supports the Large IN /Large Volume of trade model with plenty of space for PC-scaled ships to operate in, because it essentially functions as a backdrop, nothing more; the world of the megamerchants and the world of the Free Trader Beowulf never really intersect; but it supplies a justification for the vast infrastructure that exists. small ships + little trade + Imperial Navy makes about as much sense as the British Navy being built up to the height of it's strength in the 18th and 19th centuries, if faced no threats from any great powers and there were few if any merchant ships flagged in Britain, and almost nothing was traded between it's far-flung colonies and home. What is the point of such a huge expense? The imperium faces no serious threat to it's existence (the Zhoodani have never penetrated farther than a subsector or so, and the Solomani likewise, never a threat to more than a subsector. If commerce is so low level that it's managed by a relative handful of 200dt ships, where does the money come from? -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs ________________________________________ From: xxxxxx@simplelists.com <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> on behalf of Tim <xxxxxx@little-possums.net> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 11:36 PM To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com Subject: Re: [TML] J3 As I stated in a previous post, I believe this should be a consequence of Traveller technology. But according to canonical price lists and wages, it isn't. Despite the advanced technology allowing automation and nearly free energy, basic material goods are still just as expensive as on today's Earth, or in some cases even more so.